09-09-2011, 05:50 PM
Peter, you covered what I had in mind. Chain of custody and security for multiple assays. Decentralized approaches work better than centralization. Hopefuily the myriads of involved are using photographic time-stamping and the like...
Jeffrey, I agree about the conclusiveness, especially about the solitariness of controlled demolition. It is safe to say that we don't yet fully understand the means -- and perhaps there were several -- at work. But we will never conclude anything without preservation of evidence, information, etc.
The thing I am focused on is driving the issue for further independent investigation and not letting the culprits get away with slippery propagandistic myth-making. [The airwaves here are alive with it this week. "The View" just trotted out Rudy Giuliani, and Dick Cheney's PR push for his book is on the move.] There is absolute proof of something unusual and untoward that hasn't been addressed, or acknowledged, or accounted for. It is one peg, one wedge, that can be pointed to that cannot be attacked, discounted, or disproven.
Jeffrey, I agree about the conclusiveness, especially about the solitariness of controlled demolition. It is safe to say that we don't yet fully understand the means -- and perhaps there were several -- at work. But we will never conclude anything without preservation of evidence, information, etc.
The thing I am focused on is driving the issue for further independent investigation and not letting the culprits get away with slippery propagandistic myth-making. [The airwaves here are alive with it this week. "The View" just trotted out Rudy Giuliani, and Dick Cheney's PR push for his book is on the move.] There is absolute proof of something unusual and untoward that hasn't been addressed, or acknowledged, or accounted for. It is one peg, one wedge, that can be pointed to that cannot be attacked, discounted, or disproven.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"