16-09-2011, 07:39 AM
Yes, Ed, "Who killed John O'Neill?" came to my mind as well. Some Alex Jones material as well.
It might be interesting to know that Ryan Dawson published a book in 2006 (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Welcome...?z=y&itm=1). Judging from the customer reviews, it seems to have mixed responses.
About the film, I think it is a "classical" Wake-Up film by someone who felt this himself, got angry and began working feverishly to make others wake up as well. This film is so packed with pieces of diverse information, repeated several times in rapid cuts that by the end everybody must be dizzy. It might be interesting to note, what is NOT in the film. It is not really strong on details of the actual events on 9/11 or on Afghan/Pakistan/Saudi geopolitics before 9/11. Many other issues as well, that can be seen in connection to 911.
But Global Warming is in it, for whatever reason.
It will be seen as classical "conspiracism" by its critics.
It might be interesting to know that Ryan Dawson published a book in 2006 (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Welcome...?z=y&itm=1). Judging from the customer reviews, it seems to have mixed responses.
About the film, I think it is a "classical" Wake-Up film by someone who felt this himself, got angry and began working feverishly to make others wake up as well. This film is so packed with pieces of diverse information, repeated several times in rapid cuts that by the end everybody must be dizzy. It might be interesting to note, what is NOT in the film. It is not really strong on details of the actual events on 9/11 or on Afghan/Pakistan/Saudi geopolitics before 9/11. Many other issues as well, that can be seen in connection to 911.
But Global Warming is in it, for whatever reason.
It will be seen as classical "conspiracism" by its critics.
The most relevant literature regarding what happened since September 11, 2001 is George Orwell's "1984".