First CIA Asset To Openly Blow The Whistle On 911 Foreknowledge of Hijackings And Where.

[Peter Lemkin]

Some time ago, when Susan Lindauer first appeared on the scene, I heard of her book and offered to write a review of it. I sent her an e-mail and then a check to cover the cost of the book at her request, and then embarked on a string of e-mail correspondence about the review not yet even written, or the book not yet even read. After a while, I decided to return the book and beg off the opportunity to review it. I was told I could not have a refund and that the deal was that I write a review. I declined the refund. I declined her demand that I return the book which I had paid for so she could send it to some other potential reviewer. Finally, given her insistence that she had gone to great expense to provide me with the book and could not afford to send another, I sent her the funds to cover four such books which she could then send to others.

If anyone wants my "read" on the impressions and preliminary research that suggested to me that I sidestep this woman's tale, send me a PM.

There is plenty to question about her analysis...and I don't personally buy her theory on how 911 happened. That is not the point. There is IMO only ONE real point to her story and that is whether or not there was foreknowledge of an attempt [whether by outsiders or insiders] to hijack planes and fly them into the WTC [and at just about the time of the event]. Beyond that, she is speculating - and from the video doesn't even seem to have read deeply of the 911 Truth research thus far. I guess some could question her entire story and I don't claim to have independent proof nor to have done the research to make an intelligent call on this, yet. She was under most person's radar until the book came out and it is only now getting much attention. Time will tell. If it is true that she was kept in prison for a year, that alone makes one wonder why, indeed! She is clearly not mentally incompetent. To me, again, the only importance is her core story - that of being told of foreknowledge and seemingly being silenced after the event for stating so. Let the vetting begin. Personally, her own theories on 911 or Libya now don't interest me - only that core info re: foreknowledge and where it might have come from.