10-10-2011, 05:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2011, 06:45 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Page 26:
By now Caesar is in a full-fledged run with the devil. He utilizes a sleazy tactic of confirming that there was a cigarette shop Monika could have gone to on her claimed cigarette trip. Using this he then tries to parlay it into a confirmation of Monika's 10:20am wake-up time story originally told to the Inquest. This takes real nerve because we have numerous conflicting accounts coming from many of the main witnesses, including Eric Burdon, who admitted Monika called him around dawn (5:45am). We also have Gerry Stickells admitting Terry Slater called him between 8 and 9am. Even after Judy Wong was gotten to and changed her story, she still said Monika called her around 9am. (Monika said she called Wong before Burdon, so that call had to be near 5:40am. Wong lied about the time of this call in order to cover what really happened). Caesar ignores all these conflicts and just focuses on Monika's story, hoping his confirmation of the cigarette shop will carry it.
From there Caesar dutifully reports the calculated lies of Alvenia Bridges and any others who were involved in the cover-up. If you watch 'The Man They Made God' you'll see Eric Burdon admit that Monika called at dawn and Alvenia went right over, yet in 'Until We Meet Again' Caesar presents Alvenia telling us Monika cleaned the flat on her own before the ambulance came. Like both Caesar and Monika, Alvenia manages to erase 5 hours of time by doing this.
At this point Caesar commits another gross criminal act. He lies and says the constable arrived before the ambulance because the ambulance service automatically summons the police upon being called. Caesar gives no reference to this because it's an outright lie. The truth is the ambulance attendants summoned the constable because the flat was empty when they arrived and British law requires them to summon the police when there is no one there to identify the victim. Caesar knows this and is deliberately lying to get around it. I think he's damned himself with this. Caesar knows the original account told by the ambulance attendants who gave the description above. He literally has to lie, just like the object of his efforts Monika, to get around the traps. One constable, Ian Smith, confirmed Monika wasn't there. To get around this Caesar quotes Smith disowning this statement after Scotland Yard approached him. However the original statement was clear and identically matched other original statements confirming it.
To further his own damnation Caesar then prints Monika's pure fabrications about meeting the ambulance attendants as they arrived, hearing from them Jimi would be all right, and then riding with them in the ambulance. All of these are confirmed lies proven by statements taken from all those involved, as well as private remarks from others involved at the time, yet there you have Caesar presenting them as verified and true. What is really creepy is the realization Monika may be repeating the words of the murderers when speaking about how the ambulance men told her Jimi would be all right. Or speaking about witnessing them tipping Jimi's head back and keeping him from breathing.
Page 27:
I believe Caesar could be burning his soul here in public when he goes and fetches new quotes from the ambulance attendants claiming there might have been someone there when they arrived. Now all of a sudden Jimi was alive and had not made the evacuation mess in the ambulance. Also, Reginald Jones allegedly throws in the extra bonus of saying he now vaguely recalls seeing a woman at admissions at the hospital. In one fell swoop Jones has now reversed all the incriminating evidence against Monika and reversed everything he was recorded saying in the original interviews. Caesar is running naked and wild here because he gives absolutely no background context or comment as to the source of these statements. For all we know they could be coming from Dee Mitchell and could be completely invented.
In any case the true context of these statements is that Scotland Yard started going out and interviewing all the main witnesses after Kathy Etchingham got their original statements. Scotland Yard, like FBI, can have a curious effect on witnesses once they come into contact with them. In any case we have no idea what those witnesses were shown to make them disown their comments. Anyone who reads the confident wording used in the original statements would see right away that they couldn't possibly be reversed without serious explanation. In Caesar's indefinite smoke and mirrors job he carefully crafts all input around this and never demands any explanation for the alleged changes in stories he produces. He just hears what he wants to hear any way he can get it and goes with it. In no way whatsoever is this any kind of credible 'investigation'. Caesar is an evil surfer who rides the crest of the wave of deception he creates. If these changed accounts are directly from the attendants then they've been gotten to. There's no way they can get away with these radical changes in story without being made to account for it.
A good example of the credulous nature of this work is ambulance attendant Jones who says "if Monika didn't ride with us in the ambulance how could she have known which hospital we went to?" Well, how about Monika rode in her car to the hospital while following the ambulance? This so called investigation is pathetic and doesn't bother to ask all the other witnesses who spoke about watching the ambulance arrive while standing across the street with Monika (quote: Slater).
Caesar says that if Jimi was dead they would have sealed the flat off and declared it a crime scene. However Caesar purposefully ignores the fact that the original accounts from the witnesses admitted Jimi was black and was therefore carted-off to hospital to save the police paper work. Terry Slater admitted to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi was dead while they cleaned the flat.
Caesar once again has to do damage control for Alvenia's lies. He says her statement to author Jerry Hopkins, that she arrived just as the ambulance pulled-up, was false. He also adds her statement that Monika checked Jimi into the hospital under false name was also false. Well, yes, Caesar is correct here, those statements were false, but only because they were being used to protect Monika's lies. Caesar, once again, has the abject nerve to bend statements in his favor because of his need to cover for Monika's lies. Never once does he detect that he has to do so much correction because the stories were all based on lies. What Caesar does is go out and prune everybody else's statements in order to make them fit Monika's. He's crazy because he's doing this in broad daylight and thinking he's getting away with it right in the face of what is already known. He thinks we don't see him doing it.
Caesar now turns to Doctor Seifert to get him to completely change his story. If you read Dr Seifert's original statements in Tony Brown, and also on BBC's 'The Man They Made God', he's pretty unequivocal that Jimi was dead when they received him and that the monitor was flat. Dr Seifert repeated many times that he worked on Jimi for only a few minutes and then quit because Jimi was obviously dead and he had other patients. This would cover the established times of 11:46am to about 11:49. Caesar now has Dr Seifert quoted as saying there "may have been some breathing involved". This statement is so vague and so obviously reluctant to claim Jimi was actually breathing, that it should be obvious for what it is. Furthermore Dr Seifert now claims he worked on Jimi for ten minutes and then declared him dead. If we go to the known timeline this would now entail Dr Seifert working on Jimi from 12:05 to 12:15 when Jimi was declared dead. Not only does this reverse the previous juncture at which Dr Seifert treated Jimi, but it also puts Dr Seifert right next to Doctor Bannister when he was allegedly suctioning bottles of wine from Hendrix's lungs. Dr Seifert never mentions Dr Bannister or what he was doing in this new account. Also Dr Seifert was previously quoted as saying Dr Bannister continued to treat Jimi after he quit (at 11:49) and that's why he didn't witness what Dr Bannister witnessed. Caesar offers no explanation for this bizarre change of accounts, instead he offers a shameless attack on Dr Bannister and his professional reputation (as if that would compensate for his not being able to explain these radical changes). As far as Caesar quoting Dr Seifert as not detecting any alcohol on Jimi, he should reference his own source, Monika, who admitted to Sharon Lawrence that she washed 'sick' off Jimi's face with wine.
Page 28:
Caesar continues to smear Dr Bannister by indirectly suggesting that the doctor who Monika claims treated Jimi lectured her on interracial couples. Caesar then quotes minor errors by Dr Bannister in accounts of that morning to try to paint him as unreliable and calls his input "inconsistent". This takes real nerve considering he is defending one of the most notorious liars and offerers of completely inconsistent information in Monika. Monika is 'consistent' all right, but only in the sense that she stuck to her lies no matter what.
Caesar then relates Dr Bannister's accurate account of receiving Jimi dead and witnessing unusual amounts of red wine exuding from his mouth and nose. He seizes on Dr Bannister's use of the word "unconscious" to prove Jimi wasn't dead, but little does Caesar realize that unconsciousness also overlaps with the description of dead. Meanwhile the rest of Dr Bannister's statement makes it more than clear Jimi was dead with cyanosed cheek tissue when Dr Bannister received him. Important in this quote from Dr Bannister is his description of suctioning wine from Hendrix.
Ultimately Caesar gives very little direct refutation of Dr Bannister's more than clear evidence for both death and drowning in red wine on page 28. I get the sense that he does this because there's very little he can refute. Instead Caesar deals with this by offering a special highlighted box which describes Dr Bannister's being struck-off the medical register for billing fraud. Intel often attacks witnesses to its crimes by such defamation and character destruction means. I would bet if US doctors were held to the same standard as Dr Bannister more than half would be de-licensed. Was Dr Bannister struck-off because he was a bad doctor or was he struck-off because he witnessed something very dangerous?
Page 29:
Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he and Dr Bannister were called to the Department as soon as Jimi arrived. Well, Jimi arrived at 11:46am. However just a few pages back Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he worked on Hendrix until he declared him dead. Jimi was declared dead at 12:15, as the record shows. Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying he only worked on Jimi for ten minutes. 12:15 minus ten minutes only gets Dr Seifert back to 12:05. It doesn't get him anywhere close to the 11:46 he now claims right next to his other statement, and Caesar doesn't ask him to account.
Jimi was witnessed by the ambulance attendants as being fully-dressed. It's part of the evidence that he was murdered. Here on page 29 Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying Jimi was fully-clothed when he received him. This doesn't work well for Caesar so he inserts a [sic] next to this and corrects Dr Seifert on Jimi's clothing status saying he was actually naked. Caesar gives no source for this claim, he simply pronounces it. The reason he does this is because he knows Jimi's being fully-dressed endangers Monika's claim of being in bed with Jimi.
Finally Caesar fails to notice he quotes Dr Seifert once again coming around to his original statement that he worked on Jimi for only a short time and didn't know what Dr Bannister did. Well, if Dr Seifert's new claim is true then how could he -not- know what Dr Bannister did since he would have been standing right next to him? No, Dr Seifert exposes himself here. This story doesn't match the new one Caesar has come up with.
Caesar once again stupidly tries to exploit semantics by saying Dr Bannister claimed Jimi was both unconscious and dead. Well, for the instant that the receiving doctor doesn't have the equipment to determine the life state of the victim they are medically referred to as "unconscious". This can be reversed when the doctor detects medical evidence that the patient was long dead as Bannister did. Caesar's methodology is fatuous. Its dishonest nature of trying to smear Dr Bannister wherever possible, and twist every conceivable fact against him, is kind of obvious. Caesar is desperately reaching and it isn't working in a bad way.
Next Caesar tries to claim that rigor mortis and lividity are inescapable medical factors that preclude Jimi being long dead as Dr Bannister claimed. This is silly, however, because common medical knowledge tells us rigor can be delayed significantly in various cases. Keep in mind that Jimi was pickled in wine and suffused with muscle-relaxing barbiturate. Perhaps the damp basement flat also had some affect. This alleged irrefutable 'proof' Caesar brings is nothing of the sort. Meanwhile he goes on to tell us the nurses are trained to detect such symptoms when the patient arrives and if Jimi was dead they would have known it. However he forgets that Dr Seifert and Dr Bannister were the ones who received Jimi. This is all silly, however, because the ambulance attendants were clear that Jimi was dead when they encountered him, and Terry Slater admitted Jimi was dead when they cleaned the flat. Caesar's weak equivocations and excuse-making won't get around that reality.
And here is where Caesar makes one of his worst bungling mistakes. He thinks he has the final thrust to end the issue when he references the death certificate that shows Dr Seifert filling-in a box that asks if a medical doctor treated the victim either before or after death. Dr Seifert fills it in by indicating he treated Jimi both "before and after" death. Caesar gets boastful in his perceived victory here and imagined final proof, however he's too stupid to realize that until the patient is legally declared dead he is technically still legally 'alive'. When Dr Seifert indicated on the form that he treated Hendrix both before and after death he was referring to legal death not clinical. This is simply a technicality that is more proof of Caesar's desperation and incompetence than anything else. He should never be allowed to present any kind of opinion about Jimi Hendrix's death to the public.
Caesar's worst blunder is his claim that the red wine didn't exist because it wasn't detected at the autopsy. In another example of Caesar's pure stupidity, he failed to realize the wine could not possibly be found at the autopsy because it had been suctioned-out and disposed of down the drain by Dr Bannister at the hospital 3 days earlier. Instead of seeing what this indicates Caesar once again pulls an outrageous reversal and claims that the negligible blood alcohol content proves there was no wine in the lungs. He states that if the wine existed it would have necessitated a high blood alcohol content. Caesar once again wags the dog with its tail by failing to recognize the obvious, that is, that the low blood alcohol level is serious forensic evidence that the wine was not in Jimi for a long period before he died. And that is the exact forensic pattern of being drowned in wine as is being claimed. But seeing how Caesar insists reality bend to his demands he simply operates by the method that everything he thinks is true and everything else is therefore naturally wrong. Caesar is one of the most outrageous egotistical, lying, arrogant jackasses I've ever seen dare go public. Especially on this kind of serious matter.
Caesar once again quotes Stella Douglas as saying Jimi didn't like red wine. Nowhere does Caesar ever allow that the red wine didn't end-up in Jimi voluntarily. Caesar self-excuses himself from admitting this by simply seeing himself as out to disprove it, however disproving something is no way to conduct any kind of valid 'investigation'. True investigations must look at all evidence objectively.
Finally, the reason Dr Bannister was the main witness to the wine was because he uncorked the hard, dry plug of vomit that the ambulance attendants identified in Jimi's windpipe. Since Dr Seifert's true account had him quit before Dr Bannister removed this plug, this explains why Dr Bannister was the only one to witness the wine. By the time Dr Bannister suctioned it out Dr Seifert had already walked away.
Caesar tries to say the red wine was actually Coca Cola that Monika served Jimi, but we know that there was "bottles worth" witnessed in Jimi's lungs and stomach. Therefore if this was Coke Jimi would have had a remarkable level of caffeine discovered in him at the autopsy. There was none detected. It was wine because we know there were unaccounted-for wine bottles at the Samarkand, and we know Dr Bannister witnessed significant amounts of wine saturating Jimi's hair and the scarf wrapped around his neck - not to mention the smell.
Next, Caesar knows Dr Crompton witnessed serious evidence of Jimi dying earlier than Monika claimed. So he opens his section on Dr Crompton by once again defaming him as an opening move. Caesar lets loose with his own specious delivery of pure conjecture and contrived 'facts' in order to discredit Dr Crompton. He heavily criticizes Dr Crompton on the issue of the wine saying Dr Crompton never even saw the patient and was depending on hearsay. He claims Jimi last drank wine at around midnight so how could anyone smell or witness wine on him 11 hours later at the hospital? However, once again, Caesar fails to consider that Monika admitted washing vomit off Jimi with wine (Monika was really making an excuse for her knowledge that Jimi had been drowned in wine).
.
By now Caesar is in a full-fledged run with the devil. He utilizes a sleazy tactic of confirming that there was a cigarette shop Monika could have gone to on her claimed cigarette trip. Using this he then tries to parlay it into a confirmation of Monika's 10:20am wake-up time story originally told to the Inquest. This takes real nerve because we have numerous conflicting accounts coming from many of the main witnesses, including Eric Burdon, who admitted Monika called him around dawn (5:45am). We also have Gerry Stickells admitting Terry Slater called him between 8 and 9am. Even after Judy Wong was gotten to and changed her story, she still said Monika called her around 9am. (Monika said she called Wong before Burdon, so that call had to be near 5:40am. Wong lied about the time of this call in order to cover what really happened). Caesar ignores all these conflicts and just focuses on Monika's story, hoping his confirmation of the cigarette shop will carry it.
From there Caesar dutifully reports the calculated lies of Alvenia Bridges and any others who were involved in the cover-up. If you watch 'The Man They Made God' you'll see Eric Burdon admit that Monika called at dawn and Alvenia went right over, yet in 'Until We Meet Again' Caesar presents Alvenia telling us Monika cleaned the flat on her own before the ambulance came. Like both Caesar and Monika, Alvenia manages to erase 5 hours of time by doing this.
At this point Caesar commits another gross criminal act. He lies and says the constable arrived before the ambulance because the ambulance service automatically summons the police upon being called. Caesar gives no reference to this because it's an outright lie. The truth is the ambulance attendants summoned the constable because the flat was empty when they arrived and British law requires them to summon the police when there is no one there to identify the victim. Caesar knows this and is deliberately lying to get around it. I think he's damned himself with this. Caesar knows the original account told by the ambulance attendants who gave the description above. He literally has to lie, just like the object of his efforts Monika, to get around the traps. One constable, Ian Smith, confirmed Monika wasn't there. To get around this Caesar quotes Smith disowning this statement after Scotland Yard approached him. However the original statement was clear and identically matched other original statements confirming it.
To further his own damnation Caesar then prints Monika's pure fabrications about meeting the ambulance attendants as they arrived, hearing from them Jimi would be all right, and then riding with them in the ambulance. All of these are confirmed lies proven by statements taken from all those involved, as well as private remarks from others involved at the time, yet there you have Caesar presenting them as verified and true. What is really creepy is the realization Monika may be repeating the words of the murderers when speaking about how the ambulance men told her Jimi would be all right. Or speaking about witnessing them tipping Jimi's head back and keeping him from breathing.
Page 27:
I believe Caesar could be burning his soul here in public when he goes and fetches new quotes from the ambulance attendants claiming there might have been someone there when they arrived. Now all of a sudden Jimi was alive and had not made the evacuation mess in the ambulance. Also, Reginald Jones allegedly throws in the extra bonus of saying he now vaguely recalls seeing a woman at admissions at the hospital. In one fell swoop Jones has now reversed all the incriminating evidence against Monika and reversed everything he was recorded saying in the original interviews. Caesar is running naked and wild here because he gives absolutely no background context or comment as to the source of these statements. For all we know they could be coming from Dee Mitchell and could be completely invented.
In any case the true context of these statements is that Scotland Yard started going out and interviewing all the main witnesses after Kathy Etchingham got their original statements. Scotland Yard, like FBI, can have a curious effect on witnesses once they come into contact with them. In any case we have no idea what those witnesses were shown to make them disown their comments. Anyone who reads the confident wording used in the original statements would see right away that they couldn't possibly be reversed without serious explanation. In Caesar's indefinite smoke and mirrors job he carefully crafts all input around this and never demands any explanation for the alleged changes in stories he produces. He just hears what he wants to hear any way he can get it and goes with it. In no way whatsoever is this any kind of credible 'investigation'. Caesar is an evil surfer who rides the crest of the wave of deception he creates. If these changed accounts are directly from the attendants then they've been gotten to. There's no way they can get away with these radical changes in story without being made to account for it.
A good example of the credulous nature of this work is ambulance attendant Jones who says "if Monika didn't ride with us in the ambulance how could she have known which hospital we went to?" Well, how about Monika rode in her car to the hospital while following the ambulance? This so called investigation is pathetic and doesn't bother to ask all the other witnesses who spoke about watching the ambulance arrive while standing across the street with Monika (quote: Slater).
Caesar says that if Jimi was dead they would have sealed the flat off and declared it a crime scene. However Caesar purposefully ignores the fact that the original accounts from the witnesses admitted Jimi was black and was therefore carted-off to hospital to save the police paper work. Terry Slater admitted to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi was dead while they cleaned the flat.
Caesar once again has to do damage control for Alvenia's lies. He says her statement to author Jerry Hopkins, that she arrived just as the ambulance pulled-up, was false. He also adds her statement that Monika checked Jimi into the hospital under false name was also false. Well, yes, Caesar is correct here, those statements were false, but only because they were being used to protect Monika's lies. Caesar, once again, has the abject nerve to bend statements in his favor because of his need to cover for Monika's lies. Never once does he detect that he has to do so much correction because the stories were all based on lies. What Caesar does is go out and prune everybody else's statements in order to make them fit Monika's. He's crazy because he's doing this in broad daylight and thinking he's getting away with it right in the face of what is already known. He thinks we don't see him doing it.
Caesar now turns to Doctor Seifert to get him to completely change his story. If you read Dr Seifert's original statements in Tony Brown, and also on BBC's 'The Man They Made God', he's pretty unequivocal that Jimi was dead when they received him and that the monitor was flat. Dr Seifert repeated many times that he worked on Jimi for only a few minutes and then quit because Jimi was obviously dead and he had other patients. This would cover the established times of 11:46am to about 11:49. Caesar now has Dr Seifert quoted as saying there "may have been some breathing involved". This statement is so vague and so obviously reluctant to claim Jimi was actually breathing, that it should be obvious for what it is. Furthermore Dr Seifert now claims he worked on Jimi for ten minutes and then declared him dead. If we go to the known timeline this would now entail Dr Seifert working on Jimi from 12:05 to 12:15 when Jimi was declared dead. Not only does this reverse the previous juncture at which Dr Seifert treated Jimi, but it also puts Dr Seifert right next to Doctor Bannister when he was allegedly suctioning bottles of wine from Hendrix's lungs. Dr Seifert never mentions Dr Bannister or what he was doing in this new account. Also Dr Seifert was previously quoted as saying Dr Bannister continued to treat Jimi after he quit (at 11:49) and that's why he didn't witness what Dr Bannister witnessed. Caesar offers no explanation for this bizarre change of accounts, instead he offers a shameless attack on Dr Bannister and his professional reputation (as if that would compensate for his not being able to explain these radical changes). As far as Caesar quoting Dr Seifert as not detecting any alcohol on Jimi, he should reference his own source, Monika, who admitted to Sharon Lawrence that she washed 'sick' off Jimi's face with wine.
Page 28:
Caesar continues to smear Dr Bannister by indirectly suggesting that the doctor who Monika claims treated Jimi lectured her on interracial couples. Caesar then quotes minor errors by Dr Bannister in accounts of that morning to try to paint him as unreliable and calls his input "inconsistent". This takes real nerve considering he is defending one of the most notorious liars and offerers of completely inconsistent information in Monika. Monika is 'consistent' all right, but only in the sense that she stuck to her lies no matter what.
Caesar then relates Dr Bannister's accurate account of receiving Jimi dead and witnessing unusual amounts of red wine exuding from his mouth and nose. He seizes on Dr Bannister's use of the word "unconscious" to prove Jimi wasn't dead, but little does Caesar realize that unconsciousness also overlaps with the description of dead. Meanwhile the rest of Dr Bannister's statement makes it more than clear Jimi was dead with cyanosed cheek tissue when Dr Bannister received him. Important in this quote from Dr Bannister is his description of suctioning wine from Hendrix.
Ultimately Caesar gives very little direct refutation of Dr Bannister's more than clear evidence for both death and drowning in red wine on page 28. I get the sense that he does this because there's very little he can refute. Instead Caesar deals with this by offering a special highlighted box which describes Dr Bannister's being struck-off the medical register for billing fraud. Intel often attacks witnesses to its crimes by such defamation and character destruction means. I would bet if US doctors were held to the same standard as Dr Bannister more than half would be de-licensed. Was Dr Bannister struck-off because he was a bad doctor or was he struck-off because he witnessed something very dangerous?
Page 29:
Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he and Dr Bannister were called to the Department as soon as Jimi arrived. Well, Jimi arrived at 11:46am. However just a few pages back Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he worked on Hendrix until he declared him dead. Jimi was declared dead at 12:15, as the record shows. Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying he only worked on Jimi for ten minutes. 12:15 minus ten minutes only gets Dr Seifert back to 12:05. It doesn't get him anywhere close to the 11:46 he now claims right next to his other statement, and Caesar doesn't ask him to account.
Jimi was witnessed by the ambulance attendants as being fully-dressed. It's part of the evidence that he was murdered. Here on page 29 Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying Jimi was fully-clothed when he received him. This doesn't work well for Caesar so he inserts a [sic] next to this and corrects Dr Seifert on Jimi's clothing status saying he was actually naked. Caesar gives no source for this claim, he simply pronounces it. The reason he does this is because he knows Jimi's being fully-dressed endangers Monika's claim of being in bed with Jimi.
Finally Caesar fails to notice he quotes Dr Seifert once again coming around to his original statement that he worked on Jimi for only a short time and didn't know what Dr Bannister did. Well, if Dr Seifert's new claim is true then how could he -not- know what Dr Bannister did since he would have been standing right next to him? No, Dr Seifert exposes himself here. This story doesn't match the new one Caesar has come up with.
Caesar once again stupidly tries to exploit semantics by saying Dr Bannister claimed Jimi was both unconscious and dead. Well, for the instant that the receiving doctor doesn't have the equipment to determine the life state of the victim they are medically referred to as "unconscious". This can be reversed when the doctor detects medical evidence that the patient was long dead as Bannister did. Caesar's methodology is fatuous. Its dishonest nature of trying to smear Dr Bannister wherever possible, and twist every conceivable fact against him, is kind of obvious. Caesar is desperately reaching and it isn't working in a bad way.
Next Caesar tries to claim that rigor mortis and lividity are inescapable medical factors that preclude Jimi being long dead as Dr Bannister claimed. This is silly, however, because common medical knowledge tells us rigor can be delayed significantly in various cases. Keep in mind that Jimi was pickled in wine and suffused with muscle-relaxing barbiturate. Perhaps the damp basement flat also had some affect. This alleged irrefutable 'proof' Caesar brings is nothing of the sort. Meanwhile he goes on to tell us the nurses are trained to detect such symptoms when the patient arrives and if Jimi was dead they would have known it. However he forgets that Dr Seifert and Dr Bannister were the ones who received Jimi. This is all silly, however, because the ambulance attendants were clear that Jimi was dead when they encountered him, and Terry Slater admitted Jimi was dead when they cleaned the flat. Caesar's weak equivocations and excuse-making won't get around that reality.
And here is where Caesar makes one of his worst bungling mistakes. He thinks he has the final thrust to end the issue when he references the death certificate that shows Dr Seifert filling-in a box that asks if a medical doctor treated the victim either before or after death. Dr Seifert fills it in by indicating he treated Jimi both "before and after" death. Caesar gets boastful in his perceived victory here and imagined final proof, however he's too stupid to realize that until the patient is legally declared dead he is technically still legally 'alive'. When Dr Seifert indicated on the form that he treated Hendrix both before and after death he was referring to legal death not clinical. This is simply a technicality that is more proof of Caesar's desperation and incompetence than anything else. He should never be allowed to present any kind of opinion about Jimi Hendrix's death to the public.
Caesar's worst blunder is his claim that the red wine didn't exist because it wasn't detected at the autopsy. In another example of Caesar's pure stupidity, he failed to realize the wine could not possibly be found at the autopsy because it had been suctioned-out and disposed of down the drain by Dr Bannister at the hospital 3 days earlier. Instead of seeing what this indicates Caesar once again pulls an outrageous reversal and claims that the negligible blood alcohol content proves there was no wine in the lungs. He states that if the wine existed it would have necessitated a high blood alcohol content. Caesar once again wags the dog with its tail by failing to recognize the obvious, that is, that the low blood alcohol level is serious forensic evidence that the wine was not in Jimi for a long period before he died. And that is the exact forensic pattern of being drowned in wine as is being claimed. But seeing how Caesar insists reality bend to his demands he simply operates by the method that everything he thinks is true and everything else is therefore naturally wrong. Caesar is one of the most outrageous egotistical, lying, arrogant jackasses I've ever seen dare go public. Especially on this kind of serious matter.
Caesar once again quotes Stella Douglas as saying Jimi didn't like red wine. Nowhere does Caesar ever allow that the red wine didn't end-up in Jimi voluntarily. Caesar self-excuses himself from admitting this by simply seeing himself as out to disprove it, however disproving something is no way to conduct any kind of valid 'investigation'. True investigations must look at all evidence objectively.
Finally, the reason Dr Bannister was the main witness to the wine was because he uncorked the hard, dry plug of vomit that the ambulance attendants identified in Jimi's windpipe. Since Dr Seifert's true account had him quit before Dr Bannister removed this plug, this explains why Dr Bannister was the only one to witness the wine. By the time Dr Bannister suctioned it out Dr Seifert had already walked away.
Caesar tries to say the red wine was actually Coca Cola that Monika served Jimi, but we know that there was "bottles worth" witnessed in Jimi's lungs and stomach. Therefore if this was Coke Jimi would have had a remarkable level of caffeine discovered in him at the autopsy. There was none detected. It was wine because we know there were unaccounted-for wine bottles at the Samarkand, and we know Dr Bannister witnessed significant amounts of wine saturating Jimi's hair and the scarf wrapped around his neck - not to mention the smell.
Next, Caesar knows Dr Crompton witnessed serious evidence of Jimi dying earlier than Monika claimed. So he opens his section on Dr Crompton by once again defaming him as an opening move. Caesar lets loose with his own specious delivery of pure conjecture and contrived 'facts' in order to discredit Dr Crompton. He heavily criticizes Dr Crompton on the issue of the wine saying Dr Crompton never even saw the patient and was depending on hearsay. He claims Jimi last drank wine at around midnight so how could anyone smell or witness wine on him 11 hours later at the hospital? However, once again, Caesar fails to consider that Monika admitted washing vomit off Jimi with wine (Monika was really making an excuse for her knowledge that Jimi had been drowned in wine).
.