10-10-2011, 05:13 PM
(This post was last modified: 15-08-2014, 05:43 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Page 34: The Inquest
This page deals mostly with the verbatim transcripts of the Inquest. It consists of the nominal questions asked of the witnesses to determine if there was any outward evidence of strange behavior or drug use in the victim. It is basically the state giving itself legal coverage that it investigated the circumstances of the victim's death to the satisfaction of the law. Amusing is Gerry Stickells minimizing Jimi's somewhat famous recreational drug habits (which had nothing to do with his murder).
Page 35:
On this page Caesar covers Monika's infamous statement to the Inquest. She presents the suggestion to the Inquest that Jimi slept comfortably with her at the Samarkand on each night since Tuesday the 15th. Some doubt this and present stories of Jimi being other places on some of those nights. Monika tries to portray a comfortable and close romantic relationship with Jimi in her stories to try and reinforce the fiancee scenario. She then tells of arriving back at the Samarkand from Harvey's at 8:30. She does this because she's trying to eliminate the screaming fight she had with Jimi during the true times involved. Caesar, of course, presents this straight, uncontested, and without comment, taking Monika at her word.
Monika tells of taking 1 Vesparax herself at 7am and making Jimi two fish sandwiches. She then claims she awoke at 10:20. From there she tells the usual cigarette trip story, finding Jimi sick upon her return, and calling the ambulance. She claims that after she fell asleep Jimi must have snuck to the cupboard and taken the sleeping pills. Again, Caesar gives Monika unchallenged space as if to emphasize the veracity of this information. The reader would never know there is serious information proving that this account is a complete fabrication invented to cover the true story. Pay attention to the fact that Monika admits unnamed "visitors" to the secret flat.
Page 36:
There's serious question whether Monika took 1 of the Vesparax as she claimed. Personal anecdotes of recreational users of Vesparax said it was powerful. If Monika had taken them for her back injury then she would have known their strength. Furthermore Monika said the Vesparax came in plastic bubble packs of ten. If there was one found under the bed then where did Monika's single pill come from? Monika could claim that she took the first one and Jimi took the other nine and dropped one in the process, however she never claimed this. So if Jimi took nine tablets and dropped the tenth under the bed from a ten-pack then which pack did Monika take her tablet from? She never made any attempt to describe this nor did the police ever attempt to figure it out either. It's doubtful that Monika took any Vesparax that night because a full tablet would have induced a heavy sleep that would not allow her to awake refreshed 3 hours later as she claimed. Especially after drinking some wine that evening.
The rest of the page is a repeat of Monika reciting her lies to the Inquest about the 10:20 wake-up time and ensuing false story. Particularly egregious is Monika's assurance Jimi was alive and breathing with a pulse after 11am. Also Monika tells of taking "one or two" Vesparax as her usual dose. It is widely known, and also indicated by the manufacturer, that two Vesparax would be a very powerful dose equal to 4 recommended doses. Caesar, once again, prints this entire text without comment. The suggestion is obviously that it stands alone as the truth. Nowhere will the reader ever be informed that this is an infamous statement based on proven lies and a historical monument to non-truth.
Page 37:
Constable Shaw simply repeats Monika's story of finding Jimi in a pool of vomit at 11am. Caesar, once again, has the unholy nerve to 'correct' Shaw's reference to "pool" with a [sic]. The ambulance attendants also spoke of this large pool of vomit independently. This large pool of vomit is important forensic evidence and something Monika was recorded as having lied about. In his second statement Shaw tells of taking possession of the box of Vesparax and the single tablet.
Caesar now moves to Dr Teare's statements. Dr Teare confirms that 1/2 of a tablet was a normal dose. Dr Teare goes on to say he found 100 ml alcohol in the urine. This is not a correct statement and Caesar doesn't catch it. Dr Teare actually found 46mg of alcohol in the urine and then extrapolated that Jimi must have had a 100mg level upon time of Vesparax ingestion. However Dr Teare was going by Monika's timeline as given to the Inquest and assumed Jimi had died around 11:45am. This caused Dr Teare to assume Jimi was digesting the wine from midnight until 11:45am. Dr Teare was totally unaware the real time of death was closer to Dr Crompton's estimate of 5:30am. This would have completely thrown Dr Teare's calculations off to the degree of disqualifying his determination all together.
Dr Teare was unable to directly confirm Jimi died from his claimed "inhalation of vomit" because he wasn't there and the vomit had been removed. While Caesar is highly critical of people making firm statements about things they did not witness he has no problem with Dr Teare confirming the choking on vomit, even though Dr Teare is just repeating it from the hospital forms and never witnessed it himself. Dr Teare explains how barbiturate would relax the organs that prevent fluids from escaping the stomach, however he has no actual evidence that this is what happened to Jimi. He is just repeating the science of the process with the assumption it did happen to Jimi.
The Coroner then makes a summation to exclude any witnessing to the possibility of suicide. They come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough evidence to conclude suicide. This is basically mundane procedure and page-filler. What it does show is that the Inquest was brief and only sought to exclude suicide under the assumption of accidental death by drug misadventure. Nowhere was there any attempt to process the forensic evidence to investigate the possibility of murder.
Dr Thurston, head London Coroner, then signs-off the Inquest with an "Open Verdict", meaning no determined cause of death was found.
Page 38:
Page 38 contains a highlighted copy of the Post-Mortem report. It's basically a general outline of the autopsy data. It should be noted that Dr Teare found 400ml of "free fluid" in Jimi's left chest. I would assume if Dr Bannister said he removed "bottles worth of wine from Jimi's lungs and stomach" that some of this 'free fluid' was remnant wine. This is, most-likely, some remaining wine that Dr Bannister didn't get in his rush to create an oxygen interface in a race with death. I find this to be evidence of Dr Bannister's wine.
Also important is Dr Teare's identification of a small meal including noticeable grains of rice. This is critically important because Jimi was witnessed eating that rice sometime near 3am. We'll show why further on. Most important are the "whole rice grains" noted by Dr Teare.
More critical evidence is shown in Dr Teare's recording of a 5mg per 100ml blood alcohol content. This is a negligible blood alcohol content beneath the legal driving limit and will serve as a critical forensic element further on.
Barbiturate was recorded as .7mg percent of blood and a 3.9mg level was also recorded in the liver.
Here Dr Teare notes the correct urine alcohol level of 46mg. At the very bottom Dr Teare once again repeats his mistake of assuming the urine alcohol level was 100mg at the time of Vesparax ingestion. This is important because it shows the autopsists were capable of interpolating and calculating absorption rates according to known behavior. It is important because the absorption rates of the barbiturate could have been similarly determined and would have proven murder. This calculation can still be done using the very data collected by Dr Teare once it is correctly oriented with the true timeline. Neither Caesar nor the British authorities have any intention to honestly admit this.
.
This page deals mostly with the verbatim transcripts of the Inquest. It consists of the nominal questions asked of the witnesses to determine if there was any outward evidence of strange behavior or drug use in the victim. It is basically the state giving itself legal coverage that it investigated the circumstances of the victim's death to the satisfaction of the law. Amusing is Gerry Stickells minimizing Jimi's somewhat famous recreational drug habits (which had nothing to do with his murder).
Page 35:
On this page Caesar covers Monika's infamous statement to the Inquest. She presents the suggestion to the Inquest that Jimi slept comfortably with her at the Samarkand on each night since Tuesday the 15th. Some doubt this and present stories of Jimi being other places on some of those nights. Monika tries to portray a comfortable and close romantic relationship with Jimi in her stories to try and reinforce the fiancee scenario. She then tells of arriving back at the Samarkand from Harvey's at 8:30. She does this because she's trying to eliminate the screaming fight she had with Jimi during the true times involved. Caesar, of course, presents this straight, uncontested, and without comment, taking Monika at her word.
Monika tells of taking 1 Vesparax herself at 7am and making Jimi two fish sandwiches. She then claims she awoke at 10:20. From there she tells the usual cigarette trip story, finding Jimi sick upon her return, and calling the ambulance. She claims that after she fell asleep Jimi must have snuck to the cupboard and taken the sleeping pills. Again, Caesar gives Monika unchallenged space as if to emphasize the veracity of this information. The reader would never know there is serious information proving that this account is a complete fabrication invented to cover the true story. Pay attention to the fact that Monika admits unnamed "visitors" to the secret flat.
Page 36:
There's serious question whether Monika took 1 of the Vesparax as she claimed. Personal anecdotes of recreational users of Vesparax said it was powerful. If Monika had taken them for her back injury then she would have known their strength. Furthermore Monika said the Vesparax came in plastic bubble packs of ten. If there was one found under the bed then where did Monika's single pill come from? Monika could claim that she took the first one and Jimi took the other nine and dropped one in the process, however she never claimed this. So if Jimi took nine tablets and dropped the tenth under the bed from a ten-pack then which pack did Monika take her tablet from? She never made any attempt to describe this nor did the police ever attempt to figure it out either. It's doubtful that Monika took any Vesparax that night because a full tablet would have induced a heavy sleep that would not allow her to awake refreshed 3 hours later as she claimed. Especially after drinking some wine that evening.
The rest of the page is a repeat of Monika reciting her lies to the Inquest about the 10:20 wake-up time and ensuing false story. Particularly egregious is Monika's assurance Jimi was alive and breathing with a pulse after 11am. Also Monika tells of taking "one or two" Vesparax as her usual dose. It is widely known, and also indicated by the manufacturer, that two Vesparax would be a very powerful dose equal to 4 recommended doses. Caesar, once again, prints this entire text without comment. The suggestion is obviously that it stands alone as the truth. Nowhere will the reader ever be informed that this is an infamous statement based on proven lies and a historical monument to non-truth.
Page 37:
Constable Shaw simply repeats Monika's story of finding Jimi in a pool of vomit at 11am. Caesar, once again, has the unholy nerve to 'correct' Shaw's reference to "pool" with a [sic]. The ambulance attendants also spoke of this large pool of vomit independently. This large pool of vomit is important forensic evidence and something Monika was recorded as having lied about. In his second statement Shaw tells of taking possession of the box of Vesparax and the single tablet.
Caesar now moves to Dr Teare's statements. Dr Teare confirms that 1/2 of a tablet was a normal dose. Dr Teare goes on to say he found 100 ml alcohol in the urine. This is not a correct statement and Caesar doesn't catch it. Dr Teare actually found 46mg of alcohol in the urine and then extrapolated that Jimi must have had a 100mg level upon time of Vesparax ingestion. However Dr Teare was going by Monika's timeline as given to the Inquest and assumed Jimi had died around 11:45am. This caused Dr Teare to assume Jimi was digesting the wine from midnight until 11:45am. Dr Teare was totally unaware the real time of death was closer to Dr Crompton's estimate of 5:30am. This would have completely thrown Dr Teare's calculations off to the degree of disqualifying his determination all together.
Dr Teare was unable to directly confirm Jimi died from his claimed "inhalation of vomit" because he wasn't there and the vomit had been removed. While Caesar is highly critical of people making firm statements about things they did not witness he has no problem with Dr Teare confirming the choking on vomit, even though Dr Teare is just repeating it from the hospital forms and never witnessed it himself. Dr Teare explains how barbiturate would relax the organs that prevent fluids from escaping the stomach, however he has no actual evidence that this is what happened to Jimi. He is just repeating the science of the process with the assumption it did happen to Jimi.
The Coroner then makes a summation to exclude any witnessing to the possibility of suicide. They come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough evidence to conclude suicide. This is basically mundane procedure and page-filler. What it does show is that the Inquest was brief and only sought to exclude suicide under the assumption of accidental death by drug misadventure. Nowhere was there any attempt to process the forensic evidence to investigate the possibility of murder.
Dr Thurston, head London Coroner, then signs-off the Inquest with an "Open Verdict", meaning no determined cause of death was found.
Page 38:
Page 38 contains a highlighted copy of the Post-Mortem report. It's basically a general outline of the autopsy data. It should be noted that Dr Teare found 400ml of "free fluid" in Jimi's left chest. I would assume if Dr Bannister said he removed "bottles worth of wine from Jimi's lungs and stomach" that some of this 'free fluid' was remnant wine. This is, most-likely, some remaining wine that Dr Bannister didn't get in his rush to create an oxygen interface in a race with death. I find this to be evidence of Dr Bannister's wine.
Also important is Dr Teare's identification of a small meal including noticeable grains of rice. This is critically important because Jimi was witnessed eating that rice sometime near 3am. We'll show why further on. Most important are the "whole rice grains" noted by Dr Teare.
More critical evidence is shown in Dr Teare's recording of a 5mg per 100ml blood alcohol content. This is a negligible blood alcohol content beneath the legal driving limit and will serve as a critical forensic element further on.
Barbiturate was recorded as .7mg percent of blood and a 3.9mg level was also recorded in the liver.
Here Dr Teare notes the correct urine alcohol level of 46mg. At the very bottom Dr Teare once again repeats his mistake of assuming the urine alcohol level was 100mg at the time of Vesparax ingestion. This is important because it shows the autopsists were capable of interpolating and calculating absorption rates according to known behavior. It is important because the absorption rates of the barbiturate could have been similarly determined and would have proven murder. This calculation can still be done using the very data collected by Dr Teare once it is correctly oriented with the true timeline. Neither Caesar nor the British authorities have any intention to honestly admit this.
.