03-12-2011, 11:15 AM
Of course that is "scientific". Science is based upon observation, measurement, and experiment. Comparisons of persons and photos are invariably based upon comparisons of the properties of those persons and of those shown in the photographs. That man has the same general properties as Bush. That is apparent from observing their features and estimating their heights, weights, and build, which seem to be the same. But of course the agency specializes in creating phony documents and photos. So it would not be surprising if "blow ups" might be altered to change the party's appearance ever so slightly. And why in the world, if it were not George H.W. Bush, would Lansdale be standing by, waiting to speak with him? That's highly improbable. Does anyone have an alternative hypothesis about this guy who looks-like-GHWB? Who else could it possibly be? He seems to fit both the appearance and the context.
Vasilios Vazakas Wrote:[URL="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?8634-This-MIGHT-End-the-Bush-outside-the-TSBD...DEBACLE...MIGHT...MAYBE-...PERHAPS...KINDA...LOL&highlight=bush"]https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?8634-This-MIGHT-End-the-Bush-outside-the-TSBD...DEBACLE...MIGHT...MAYBE-...PERHAPS...KINDA...LOL&highlight=bush
[/URL]if you check this link by Bernice Moore, you'll find two photos.
the left one will convince you that this man is not GHWB. And to conclude that he is GHWB
because "He has similar height, weight, build, clothing, stance, inclination of head, facial appearance, hairline, and manner" based on a photo, With all due respect, it is not very scientific.