21-12-2011, 02:01 AM
Well, Dulles was not in the CIA in 1963.
And recall, Howard Hunt had now become his Man Friday so to speak as he was writing The Craft of Intelligence, published in 1963.
This would make Allen the perfect nerve center so to speak for those below him and, what I call, the invisible ones, above him.
IMO, from the evidence I have seen and studied, Dulles would qualify as a facilitator. Not in any way a false sponsor. A guy who knew what happened and then participated as an active agent in the cover up. In fact, one can say with accuracy, he was the single most active agent in the cover up.
Never forget his comment about Ruth Paine, it was words to the effect: If those conspiracy theorists knew I was in Dallas three weeks before the assassination, and that Mary Bancroft was friends with Oswald's landlady, what a field day they would have.
For self incrimination, this ranks with Angleton's famous, "a mansion has many rooms, I am not aware of who shot John" comment.
And recall, Howard Hunt had now become his Man Friday so to speak as he was writing The Craft of Intelligence, published in 1963.
This would make Allen the perfect nerve center so to speak for those below him and, what I call, the invisible ones, above him.
IMO, from the evidence I have seen and studied, Dulles would qualify as a facilitator. Not in any way a false sponsor. A guy who knew what happened and then participated as an active agent in the cover up. In fact, one can say with accuracy, he was the single most active agent in the cover up.
Never forget his comment about Ruth Paine, it was words to the effect: If those conspiracy theorists knew I was in Dallas three weeks before the assassination, and that Mary Bancroft was friends with Oswald's landlady, what a field day they would have.
For self incrimination, this ranks with Angleton's famous, "a mansion has many rooms, I am not aware of who shot John" comment.