Why no reply on George Bush Mr Fetzer?

[Peter Lemkin]

I thought this kind of baiting angry 'cross-this-line' or else; don't cross-this-line or else kind of post was one of the reason many of us chose to leave the EF for a new website [this Forum]. Lately, I've seen more an more of this 'style' of non-collegial posting and since no moderators seem to want to moderate it, wanted to comment. I believe it was over a variant of this very issue that lost this forum one very important member. Can't people disagree and post their disagreements in a civil manner?...or take it to the EF where they eat this kind of battle up to boost their ratings? No one should be attacked here IMHO, unless one is sure they are in the enemy camp hook, line and sinker. Surely, whatever you disagreements with Jim F. are, you can't in your right [or left] mind believe that! My two cents.

No Peter its about being taken out of context rather badly. A man of your intelligence should see that. Furthermore, I do enjoy your posts on numerous topics. Unlike Mr Fetzer, you are polite and invite a dissenting view. Thus I believe you would make for a great sparring partner. The 'important person' you are discussing has none of your qualities. Further that he needs to speak for himself.

If it is silence then let it be. Ultimately Peter as said, Mr Fetzer has taken myself way, way, way out of context to contrive an argument that never occurred. The issue is with the lies John Hankey has spread. I would appreciate that we await Mr Fetzers reply. Yes there is collegiality here and it is awesome. Nonetheless, I fail to see how my challenge here has disrupted that. JF has attacked and offended the mods here far more than I ever have. If JF is a no show it is more a reflection of himself than me.

I'm not fully aprized of what Jim F. may have said against [or perceived to be against] you, your writings elsewhere or those you agree with. I do not agree with every detail with Jim on the Dallas Magic Show nor on 911, but on both [and some other related affairs of 'National Security Bullshit and Lies' I find Jim is on the correct side of what is a false-flag lie and what is not....the details we all often disagree upon. I have dealt with Gus Russo [who cost me a bundle and things much more dear than money....] and other such slime who know the truth but speak only the Big Lie; I have seen others try to take 'down' Jack White and others over minor points - when anyone with half [or 1%] of a wit knows that Jack is on the 'good guys' side of truth on Dallas and 911. He may not get every analysis correct, but he gives it his best shot with the best of intentions and has a very good batting record, IMHO. While I see you disagree on specific points, are you saying that Jim F. is a disinformation agent or just mistaken? If the later, why not extend the same kind of collegiality you yourself would like should someone challenge your views and conclusions. I've never met Jim in person, but he came to my rescue in a big way when I was on the 'cross' over at the EF and being kicked out without ability to defend myself nor with any reasons given. I've seen him on other times express great distress when he felt others were being wronged on the internet or important information was about to be tossed into the 'rabbit hole' forever. He has been front and center on Wellstone and other cases of interest and done much to try to piece together the two big plots of recent time - Dallas and 911. No one I know has a perfect record on those two and I'd include myself in that. I can support people who I don't agree with 100%. Some can not. We all have different personal styles and even those of us with generally easy going styles can bristle with spines at times [I know I have in the past to my regret!]. Again, unless you really believe [and can support with evidence] that someone is a disinformation agent, I suggest an attempt to politely and civily find a meeting of minds or agreeing to disagree. The enemy is watching and loves to exploit such conflict - it makes their divide and conquer techniques almost childs play. My thrupence.