03-01-2012, 06:31 AM
This is Ralph Cinque. The posted URL for viewing my video series on the Altgens photo is wrong. The correct one is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_3sCGPQ3zk&feature=youtu.be
And now, I would like to respond to the various comments. I am not going to respond to the general put-downs and disparagements because I don't want to.
But, I will respond to any substantial comments that address the issues I raise, and I will address them in the order that I read them.
Regarding the shade line from the lintel, Doorman is not being shaded at all. We can see him brightly and clearly. So, why should the man standing next to him, in the same plane in relation to the lintel, with his arms raised, have his face completely blackened out? There isn't even a trace of an image there. It's like a black hole. So, I call him Black Hole Man. And remember that shade darkens an image; it doesn't usually turn it into a black hole, as we see there. But, as I discuss in video 7, there are plenty of other anomalies in that picture: there is the white blotch at the level of right axilla of Black Hole Man, and as Dr. Fetzer points out, it seems to be covering a man's face. But if not, then what is it? And below that there is an amorphous black configuration that merges with the black hair of the African American woman. Very strange. What is that? And please, no glib answers.
Regarding the Black Tie Man who seems to be fused to Doorman, Doyle says he is "real and there." Well, if he's real, who is he? What is his name? Don't you think 48 years is long enough to find out? Why didn't the Warren Commission ask? Weren't they interested? Black Tie Man was closest to Doorman of anyone. Wouldn't he have known best who Doorman was? Wasn't everyone standing there associated with the TSBD and therefore, identifiable? What excuse is there for not being able to provide his name?
And if he's behind Doorman, as Doyle insists, then why can't we see Doorman's shoulder? How can you stand behind someone and block his shoulder? Mr. Doyle, you said- glibly- that BT Man is behind Doorman. Do me a favor: drop the glibness and really delve into it. Explain it. Defend what you're saying and don't assume authority. Anyone can be glib. Anyone can make a declarative statement. But, being glib and being right are two different things. I maintain that BT Man is NOT real because he is in an impossible position in relation to Doorman, one that could never exist between two people and be recorded photographically. And if you think otherwise, then prove it by positioning two people and duplicating that image with a camera. I dare you.
Oswald was not in the lunchroom during the shooting, and he never claimed to be. He told Detective Will Fritz that he was "out in front with Bill Shelley" during the shooting. I have a copy of Frtiz' handwritten notes.
Why not take Lovelady out completely? Are you serious? The original Altgens photo had been blasted around the world within hours of the assassination. The Doorway Man had already been seen by millions and was suspected of being Oswald. Why do you think this whole controversy got started? They couldn't just get rid of him. Please, think!
The Doorway Man is wearing Oswald's shirt. Do you know how distinctive it was? It closed with a button loop at the top. Did you know that? That button loop jutted off the lapel on the left side, and its purpose was to secure the button located underneath the right collar on the other side. So, on the left side, there was a collar, a lapel, and a button loop jutting out from it. And it gave it the lay of a jacket on that side.
When we compare Doorman to Oswald we see that their collars matched perfectly on the right side. And on the left we see a long lapel on both. How often do you see shirts with a long lapel? Lovelady certainly was not wearing a shirt like that. On Oswald's left, we see the complex collar described above. But, on Doorman's left, that area is covered up by Black Tie Man. Ahhh! Tough break. Too bad. If only we could see what was there.
But, both are wearing a low-cut, v-necked t-shirt. Both are wearing an unbuttoned, loose-fitting outer shirt. Oswald's buttons were missing, so he couldn't button his. But Lovelady's buttons were NOT missing. Was he going around unbuttoned that day for some reason? But wait, in the picture we have of him from after the shooting, he doesn't look unbuttoned. So, did he button up afterwards? Did anyone see him do that? Did anyone even ask about it?
Realize: if Doorman is wearing Oswald's shirt, that is, if the shirt Doorman is wearing has the same structural form as Oswald's unique shirt, then he WAS Oswald. There is no other possibility. And he WAS wearing Oswald's shirt. They did what they could to love-lady-i-fy him, but the form, the fit, and the lay of that shirt are pure Oswald. It's him. He was outside watching during the coup. Please give my video an unbiased viewing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_3sCGPQ3...e=youtu.be
And now, I would like to respond to the various comments. I am not going to respond to the general put-downs and disparagements because I don't want to.
But, I will respond to any substantial comments that address the issues I raise, and I will address them in the order that I read them.
Regarding the shade line from the lintel, Doorman is not being shaded at all. We can see him brightly and clearly. So, why should the man standing next to him, in the same plane in relation to the lintel, with his arms raised, have his face completely blackened out? There isn't even a trace of an image there. It's like a black hole. So, I call him Black Hole Man. And remember that shade darkens an image; it doesn't usually turn it into a black hole, as we see there. But, as I discuss in video 7, there are plenty of other anomalies in that picture: there is the white blotch at the level of right axilla of Black Hole Man, and as Dr. Fetzer points out, it seems to be covering a man's face. But if not, then what is it? And below that there is an amorphous black configuration that merges with the black hair of the African American woman. Very strange. What is that? And please, no glib answers.
Regarding the Black Tie Man who seems to be fused to Doorman, Doyle says he is "real and there." Well, if he's real, who is he? What is his name? Don't you think 48 years is long enough to find out? Why didn't the Warren Commission ask? Weren't they interested? Black Tie Man was closest to Doorman of anyone. Wouldn't he have known best who Doorman was? Wasn't everyone standing there associated with the TSBD and therefore, identifiable? What excuse is there for not being able to provide his name?
And if he's behind Doorman, as Doyle insists, then why can't we see Doorman's shoulder? How can you stand behind someone and block his shoulder? Mr. Doyle, you said- glibly- that BT Man is behind Doorman. Do me a favor: drop the glibness and really delve into it. Explain it. Defend what you're saying and don't assume authority. Anyone can be glib. Anyone can make a declarative statement. But, being glib and being right are two different things. I maintain that BT Man is NOT real because he is in an impossible position in relation to Doorman, one that could never exist between two people and be recorded photographically. And if you think otherwise, then prove it by positioning two people and duplicating that image with a camera. I dare you.
Oswald was not in the lunchroom during the shooting, and he never claimed to be. He told Detective Will Fritz that he was "out in front with Bill Shelley" during the shooting. I have a copy of Frtiz' handwritten notes.
Why not take Lovelady out completely? Are you serious? The original Altgens photo had been blasted around the world within hours of the assassination. The Doorway Man had already been seen by millions and was suspected of being Oswald. Why do you think this whole controversy got started? They couldn't just get rid of him. Please, think!
The Doorway Man is wearing Oswald's shirt. Do you know how distinctive it was? It closed with a button loop at the top. Did you know that? That button loop jutted off the lapel on the left side, and its purpose was to secure the button located underneath the right collar on the other side. So, on the left side, there was a collar, a lapel, and a button loop jutting out from it. And it gave it the lay of a jacket on that side.
When we compare Doorman to Oswald we see that their collars matched perfectly on the right side. And on the left we see a long lapel on both. How often do you see shirts with a long lapel? Lovelady certainly was not wearing a shirt like that. On Oswald's left, we see the complex collar described above. But, on Doorman's left, that area is covered up by Black Tie Man. Ahhh! Tough break. Too bad. If only we could see what was there.
But, both are wearing a low-cut, v-necked t-shirt. Both are wearing an unbuttoned, loose-fitting outer shirt. Oswald's buttons were missing, so he couldn't button his. But Lovelady's buttons were NOT missing. Was he going around unbuttoned that day for some reason? But wait, in the picture we have of him from after the shooting, he doesn't look unbuttoned. So, did he button up afterwards? Did anyone see him do that? Did anyone even ask about it?
Realize: if Doorman is wearing Oswald's shirt, that is, if the shirt Doorman is wearing has the same structural form as Oswald's unique shirt, then he WAS Oswald. There is no other possibility. And he WAS wearing Oswald's shirt. They did what they could to love-lady-i-fy him, but the form, the fit, and the lay of that shirt are pure Oswald. It's him. He was outside watching during the coup. Please give my video an unbiased viewing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_3sCGPQ3...e=youtu.be