03-01-2012, 06:47 AM
Vasilios (and other good kind people), all of the videos in question have been removed from YouTube, theoretically to re-appear, but who knows? Now, with them gone, one has to ask what one thought one saw (especially having gone down almost immediately with yet another febrile episode), so we'll have to let it pass.
I don't have any thoughts other than the simple fact that there a lot of dots in close proximity to one another when you start to look at the CIA, the national security state as a whole from the days of its OSS genesis, the role that AIG played in years since Dealey Plaza, the role that AIG played in the great American Federal Reserve bailout, the role that AIG played before/during/after 9/11/01, etc etc ad nauseum. I do not state that Goldberg was personally involved in any way shape or form in any events in and around Nov. 1963; however, it is virtually undeniable [if he is the person I thought he was] that the interests with which he has been involved since 1963 have been integrally involved in state crimes, tyrans-national economic and perhaps criminal events, etc. The nexus of people and organizations [e.g., Hauer, Bremer, Convar, Marsh & McLennan et al] around what Goldberg personifies is deeply embedded in the Iron Triangle, the military-industrial complex, numerous intel agencies, indubitably the funding of a black op or two, and God knows what else.
I have also stated that in many ways I am looking at the JFK assassination through the other end of the kaleidoscope; maybe others should change the space/distance between their own lenses. The well-discussed and well-regarded Evica-Drago model may have one flaw if its users insist on using it like a Brownie box camera, trying to affix Polaroid-wannabe snapshots of personas and personalities when, if seen over time or better yet with the distance of time, they have the ability to be stop-action frame-specific videos that can better see hidden movement. [The functional analogy was the way in which the fictional military intelligence unit in Red Storm Rising sped up -- 100X -- videotapes of satellite traffic surveillance to detect the patterns that enabled them to identify the changing locations of petrol depots.]
If the debate is about sponsorship, it must look not at players in the immediate vicinity of the event but on methods, movements and mechanics of similar efforts over time.
I don't have any thoughts other than the simple fact that there a lot of dots in close proximity to one another when you start to look at the CIA, the national security state as a whole from the days of its OSS genesis, the role that AIG played in years since Dealey Plaza, the role that AIG played in the great American Federal Reserve bailout, the role that AIG played before/during/after 9/11/01, etc etc ad nauseum. I do not state that Goldberg was personally involved in any way shape or form in any events in and around Nov. 1963; however, it is virtually undeniable [if he is the person I thought he was] that the interests with which he has been involved since 1963 have been integrally involved in state crimes, tyrans-national economic and perhaps criminal events, etc. The nexus of people and organizations [e.g., Hauer, Bremer, Convar, Marsh & McLennan et al] around what Goldberg personifies is deeply embedded in the Iron Triangle, the military-industrial complex, numerous intel agencies, indubitably the funding of a black op or two, and God knows what else.
I have also stated that in many ways I am looking at the JFK assassination through the other end of the kaleidoscope; maybe others should change the space/distance between their own lenses. The well-discussed and well-regarded Evica-Drago model may have one flaw if its users insist on using it like a Brownie box camera, trying to affix Polaroid-wannabe snapshots of personas and personalities when, if seen over time or better yet with the distance of time, they have the ability to be stop-action frame-specific videos that can better see hidden movement. [The functional analogy was the way in which the fictional military intelligence unit in Red Storm Rising sped up -- 100X -- videotapes of satellite traffic surveillance to detect the patterns that enabled them to identify the changing locations of petrol depots.]
If the debate is about sponsorship, it must look not at players in the immediate vicinity of the event but on methods, movements and mechanics of similar efforts over time.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"