The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School

[Albert Doyle]

Regarding the shade line from the lintel, Doorman is not being shaded at all. We can see him brightly and clearly. So, why should the man standing next to him, in the same plane in relation to the lintel, with his arms raised, have his face completely blackened out? There isn't even a trace of an image there. It's like a black hole. So, I call him Black Hole Man. And remember that shade darkens an image; it doesn't usually turn it into a black hole, as we see there.

The statement that Raised Arms Man is on the same plane as Lovelady is false. If you do credible analysis of the Altgens Texas School Book Depository front entry blow-up you'll see Raised Arms Man is clearly standing further back than Lovelady. This is why he is intersected by the shade line from the lintel and Lovelady isn't. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would realize the reason Lovelady is forward of this shade divide is because he's leaning forward in order to look around the corner column of the entranceway. Look at the photo. Lovelady is craning his head around this corner in order to look at the limousine that has passed by and gone further down Elm St. Furthermore, the reason Raised Arms Man is so perfectly cut by the shade line is because, in the act of raising his hands to shade himself from the glare of the sun, he is using the shade line deliberately to cut-off this glare. Smart investigators will realize Raised Arms Man's posture reveals a need to shade his eyes from the sun. He backed-up just enough to use the shade line from the lintel to achieve this and that is why his face is shaded. Instead of skewing everything to fit the theory of forgery just look at what's there and the shade from the lintel explains everything.

These phantom "black holes" being attributed to CIA forgery is actually the sharp divide between light and dark created by the film type and lens. This is enhanced by the blow-up process. At that distance there simply isn't enough light to capture shaded images so they appear as black areas. Simple as that.

Dr Cinque proposes that Black Tie Man is a forgery superimposed in front of Lovelady in order to hide the fact it is Oswald wearing Oswald's shirt from that day. Any simple look at the Altgens blow-up will show that Black Tie Man is real and was there and was standing behind Lovelady as seen.

And if he's behind Doorman, as Doyle insists, then why can't we see Doorman's shoulder? How can you stand behind someone and block his shoulder? Mr. Doyle, you said- glibly- that BT Man is behind Doorman. Do me a favor: drop the glibness and really delve into it. Explain it. Defend what you're saying and don't assume authority. Anyone can be glib. Anyone can make a declarative statement. But, being glib and being right are two different things. I maintain that BT Man is NOT real because he is in an impossible position in relation to Doorman, one that could never exist between two people and be recorded photographically. And if you think otherwise, then prove it by positioning two people and duplicating that image with a camera. I dare you.

This kind of argument is self-defeating in its form alone. Lovelady's shoulder is dropped into a sharp vertical position because he's dropped his left shoulder in order to look around the corner column in the doorway. If you look closely it's there. I can see it plainly, but I'm 100% confident credible photo analysts will prove me correct. His shoulder isn't "blocked" it is dropped. This is foolish and qualifies for credulity.

If we ask doctor Cinque to show us the photographic evidence for this unique "lapel" he is going to produce some very fuzzy images he makes great claims over. I personally have a sharp eye for this kind of thing, which is why I am able to detect the real interpretations of the doorway images he discusses. However I've looked at his lapel evidence and honestly don't see what he is contending.

Was Oswald missing his buttons because the police ripped them off at the theater?