03-01-2012, 07:25 PM
I never said that Black Tie Man was in front of Doorman. You are misquoting me. My stated position has always been that Doorman and BT Man are in an impossible relationship. ONE OF THEM SHOULD HAVE A VISIBLE SHOULDER. That is, the one in front should have a visible shoulder. But neither has a visible shoulder. Therefore, BT Man is neither in front of nor behind Doorman. They are fused together like Siamese twins.
So, you are saying that Black Hole Man backed up to the lintel shade line? But, he really didn't get behind it because his shirt is so illuminated. One's torso is not forward of one's face. If anything, it's the opposite.
So, that leaves the arms. I knew you were going to have to get back to relying on those raised arms. But, the problem is that his arms are way too far out to the sides. They are not really blocking the light to his face- at least not enough to produce a black hole effect. Again, compare to the woman beneath him. And her arm is more in front of her face than either of his arms are. There is no way that his arms, as positioned, could completely block all light to reaching his face. We should see SOMETHING there. Not a black hole. How can his shading be from the lintel when it's only his face that is shaded? And since we can't see his face at all, we really don't know where his hands are. But generally, when people raise their hands like that, they rest their hands against their head, and that's because otherwise, they would have to hold them up. They get heavy! I think it's a very reasonable assumption that his hands are resting against his forehead, probably at the hairline.
Doorman is not twisted that much at all. It's a very slight twist of the left side forward. But, we should see the POINT of his shoulder. We don't. It is not visible, plainly or otherwise.
OH, so you are that guy who posted on my videos. I blocked you there, so you came here. We meet again. But, don't worry: I'm talking about you on other sites too. That was some performance.
And by the way: you should realize that lots of people don't recognize Black Tie Man as a man, and that includes other lone-nutters like yourself, and other conspiracy theorists like me.
An unnamed person? You think you can just glibly leave it at that? This ain't the Warren Commission, boy. Oswald's guilt or innocence hinged on the identity of Doorman, and this Black Tie Man was physically closer to him than people are when having sex. The omission of identifying- or even inquiring about- the Black Tie Man is glaring proof that the Warren Report was nothing but a whitewash. If they had wanted to get to the truth- rather than frame Oswald- they would have asked about Black Tie Man. But, I'll tell you why they didn't ask about him: because there was no Black Tie Man. He didn't exist. You can't interview a mirage.
Those likenesses in the collar/lapels between Doorman and Oswald mean everything. If you can't see them, that's your problem. Those two shirts were too similar to be accounted for by chance alone. You think it's all vague? You obviously have no background in Radiology. You'd be shocked at the vague lines that radiologists observe whose implications are the difference in prognosis between life and death.
So, you are saying that Black Hole Man backed up to the lintel shade line? But, he really didn't get behind it because his shirt is so illuminated. One's torso is not forward of one's face. If anything, it's the opposite.
So, that leaves the arms. I knew you were going to have to get back to relying on those raised arms. But, the problem is that his arms are way too far out to the sides. They are not really blocking the light to his face- at least not enough to produce a black hole effect. Again, compare to the woman beneath him. And her arm is more in front of her face than either of his arms are. There is no way that his arms, as positioned, could completely block all light to reaching his face. We should see SOMETHING there. Not a black hole. How can his shading be from the lintel when it's only his face that is shaded? And since we can't see his face at all, we really don't know where his hands are. But generally, when people raise their hands like that, they rest their hands against their head, and that's because otherwise, they would have to hold them up. They get heavy! I think it's a very reasonable assumption that his hands are resting against his forehead, probably at the hairline.
Doorman is not twisted that much at all. It's a very slight twist of the left side forward. But, we should see the POINT of his shoulder. We don't. It is not visible, plainly or otherwise.
OH, so you are that guy who posted on my videos. I blocked you there, so you came here. We meet again. But, don't worry: I'm talking about you on other sites too. That was some performance.
And by the way: you should realize that lots of people don't recognize Black Tie Man as a man, and that includes other lone-nutters like yourself, and other conspiracy theorists like me.
An unnamed person? You think you can just glibly leave it at that? This ain't the Warren Commission, boy. Oswald's guilt or innocence hinged on the identity of Doorman, and this Black Tie Man was physically closer to him than people are when having sex. The omission of identifying- or even inquiring about- the Black Tie Man is glaring proof that the Warren Report was nothing but a whitewash. If they had wanted to get to the truth- rather than frame Oswald- they would have asked about Black Tie Man. But, I'll tell you why they didn't ask about him: because there was no Black Tie Man. He didn't exist. You can't interview a mirage.
Those likenesses in the collar/lapels between Doorman and Oswald mean everything. If you can't see them, that's your problem. Those two shirts were too similar to be accounted for by chance alone. You think it's all vague? You obviously have no background in Radiology. You'd be shocked at the vague lines that radiologists observe whose implications are the difference in prognosis between life and death.