Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School
#30
Ralph Cinque Wrote:Mr. Doyle,

Are you blind? You cannot see the point of Doorman's left shoulder in my Video 2 or in any other image of him.


My mistake. It was You-Tube "Visible Proof Part 3" not 'Part 2' as I posted. You are ignoring my reasoning. "Doorman's" shoulder is dropped because he is hanging-on to an object with his unseen right hand and leaning-out and dropping his left shoulder into a vertical position.

Ralph Cinque said: "And I did not say that Black Tie Man was in front of Doorman."

He then said in the same paragraph: "Visually, Black Tie Man is both in front of and behind Doorman- "

I assure anyone foolish enough to still be reading this that Dr Cinque did indeed claim that the forged image of Black Tie Man was deliberately placed in front of "Doorman" in order to conceal Oswald's obvious shirt lapel seen on this figure. I think I've achieved my purpose of proving Dr Cinque's evident confusion and incoherency.




Ralph Cinque Wrote:depending on what perspective you are considering. If you consider the invisibility of Doorman's shoulder, then BT Man is in front of him. But, if you consider the invisibility of BT Man's arm and shoulder, then Doorman is in front of BT Man. Hence, indeed, it is an impossible and contradictory situation.


A very rare example of epic semantics and sophistry in order to avoid the point. "I didn't say Black Tie Man was in front of "Doorman" - well, except in the places where I said it.

To cut to the chase: "Doorman" is in front of Black Tie Man and "Doorman's" shoulder is blocking Black Tie Man's shoulder.



Ralph Cinque Wrote:And when it comes to shade from the lintel, it is not a matter of above or below, but rather of forward or back. Besides, his hands are just as "above" as his head. Therefore, why are they visible, but not his head? Aren't they at the same level as his head? His torso is lower than his head, but his hands aren't lower than his head. And his hands and arms are brightly lite.



I think the statement itself is inherently self-exposing. The shade line is defined on both vertical, horizontal, and depth axes. There is a vertical element so you are just plain wrong and have therefore failed to answer the point.





Ralph Cinque Wrote:The shade line is from the neck up? But, we can see his hands which are well above his neck. How is it that we see them when it's supposed to be shaded from the neck up?



Because the shade line runs on a diagonal from the lintel. You are applying two dimensional thinking to a three dimensional problem.




Ralph Cinque Wrote:I am not speculating when I say that people rest their hands on their head. It's tiring to hold your arms up like that without support.



He only needs to have his hands there for the fraction of a second it takes for the shutter to click.



Ralph Cinque Wrote:And speaking of wildly speculating, you are the one who is doing it when you say that Doorman is holding on to something with his right hand. How dare you? You've got some nerve.



A good detective would realize "Doorman's" shoulder drop anatomically requires his right arm to be anchored in order to drop his shoulder to that degree and offset his upper body from his feet so much.



Ralph Cinque Wrote:And again I want to point out to anyone else reading this that this isn't even central to my thesis. Black Hole Man is just a strange anomaly in the Altgens photo, part of what I call the Addams Family. I don't have any doubt that Black Hole Man is real, but I have no idea who he is.



At least you are wise enough to back-off your "Raised Arms Man" claims.



Ralph Cinque Wrote:But, my main claim is that Doorman's shirt- the physical form of it, the lay of it, the way he's wearing it, the way it fits him, and the v-necked t-shirt underneath, together prove that he is Oswald. You could take Black Hole Man out of the picture completely, and it wouldn't change a thing. But, Mr. Doyle wants to continue talking about Black Hole Man forever because he apparently does not want to address the larger, more crucial issues.

Mr. Doyle: Why is Doorman's shirt so much like Oswald's? Why is Doorman's shirt so much like Oswald's? Why is Doorman's shirt so much like Oswald's?


I would really like it if you could post your images of your Oswald shirt claims.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School - by Albert Doyle - 03-01-2012, 09:29 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Current State Of Internet Assassination Discussion Brian Doyle 0 362 23-08-2024, 07:27 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  JFK Assassination: Sequence of Events ThomasPickering 5 2,930 20-07-2022, 12:58 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale The Moderators 69 371,212 04-04-2020, 09:01 AM
Last Post: Mark A. O'Blazney
  On the Trail of Clay Shaw:The Italian Undercover CIA and Mossad Station and the Assassination of JFK Paz Marverde 4 5,545 28-11-2019, 12:32 PM
Last Post: Paz Marverde
  Weisberg's trash-the-critics book 'Inside the Assassination Industry' Richard Booth 7 5,981 28-09-2019, 12:41 AM
Last Post: Richard Booth
  Mailer's Tales of the JFK Assassination Milo Reech 4 4,727 07-06-2019, 09:47 PM
Last Post: Richard Coleman
  Collins Radio Connection to JFK Assassination - Bill Kelly (revised) Peter Lemkin 15 10,735 20-05-2019, 09:08 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  John Barbour: Averill Harriman ordered the assassination Lauren Johnson 30 32,922 18-03-2019, 05:01 PM
Last Post: Cliff Varnell
  The Inheritance: Poisoned Fruit of JFK's Assassination Lauren Johnson 1 3,233 09-02-2019, 06:02 PM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  The Key To a Successful Assassination is Control of Communications..... Peter Lemkin 0 2,596 21-01-2019, 06:30 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)