04-01-2012, 07:17 PM
Dr Cinque:
I wish you could bring your Oswald's shirt photographic analysis to the board to show us your proof. I honestly watched your video and your so called "proof" is identical to the rambling assumptions you subject us to here. In the end, besides all your unproven assertions, nothing you present precludes it from simply being Lovelady with his shirt open.
Your patronization is visibly misplaced considering what you've already shown us (or haven't shown us).
I've already explained Oswald's statements to you on You-Tube. The simple answer is if you look at the record of Oswald's statements once taken into custody he said some very crazy things. When he said that he was in custody. I'm referring to the things Oswald was recorded saying to FBI in New Orleans. Read them and then tell me you can quote Oswald directly. The rest is just us being forced to listen to your tortured logical fallacy contrivances.
Just because there's good evidence of there being many other cases of severe manipulation in the assassination evidence doesn't make your bogus theory true. Dr Cinque, you've regressed and subjected us to an overly-general overture of the possibility of Altgens photo forgery. We were previously at the point of discussing the credible facts to prove it and you failed to back-up your points in sound reasoning. That is where it stands and you failed to live up to it. Backing up and charging harder with the same stuff won't work. You have to answer the points you couldn't answer.
Most likely Oswald was fooled into thinking he was on another FBI infiltrator assignment to stop the Cuban exiles he had penetrated from pulling-off an assassination. Oswald was probably fooled into thinking he had stopped the Chicago Vallee plot and was on his next assignment. Operating under a plan similar to Operation Northwoods, the patsy Oswald was ordered into the 2nd floor lunchroom in order to be safely secluded away from the action. We've already proven you can't apply any logic to Oswald's statements, however, he would have reason to not reveal he was in the lunchroom if it was part of an operation. In the end your conclusions offer and say nothing.
Once again you commit rogue logical fallacies with casual indifference. Just because Black Tie Man was never identified doesn't mean he was a CIA forgery. He could have been one of the many conspirators that day known to be in the Plaza. That would make him real and there wouldn't it? It would make sense for a military intelligence or mafia guard to be at the front entrance to the Depository wouldn't it? What gets to me the most about the unbuttoned shirt is your refusal to answer whether those buttons were torn-off during Oswald's arrest? Otherwise there's no reason why Lovelady couldn't have had his shirt open too.
Hoover's reluctance could easily be explained by his imposing a refusal to look into any evidence besides the Sniper's Nest Lone Nut version. You are making self-serving suppositions that constitute nothing near the "proof" you claim.
I wish you could bring your Oswald's shirt photographic analysis to the board to show us your proof. I honestly watched your video and your so called "proof" is identical to the rambling assumptions you subject us to here. In the end, besides all your unproven assertions, nothing you present precludes it from simply being Lovelady with his shirt open.
Your patronization is visibly misplaced considering what you've already shown us (or haven't shown us).
I've already explained Oswald's statements to you on You-Tube. The simple answer is if you look at the record of Oswald's statements once taken into custody he said some very crazy things. When he said that he was in custody. I'm referring to the things Oswald was recorded saying to FBI in New Orleans. Read them and then tell me you can quote Oswald directly. The rest is just us being forced to listen to your tortured logical fallacy contrivances.
Just because there's good evidence of there being many other cases of severe manipulation in the assassination evidence doesn't make your bogus theory true. Dr Cinque, you've regressed and subjected us to an overly-general overture of the possibility of Altgens photo forgery. We were previously at the point of discussing the credible facts to prove it and you failed to back-up your points in sound reasoning. That is where it stands and you failed to live up to it. Backing up and charging harder with the same stuff won't work. You have to answer the points you couldn't answer.
Most likely Oswald was fooled into thinking he was on another FBI infiltrator assignment to stop the Cuban exiles he had penetrated from pulling-off an assassination. Oswald was probably fooled into thinking he had stopped the Chicago Vallee plot and was on his next assignment. Operating under a plan similar to Operation Northwoods, the patsy Oswald was ordered into the 2nd floor lunchroom in order to be safely secluded away from the action. We've already proven you can't apply any logic to Oswald's statements, however, he would have reason to not reveal he was in the lunchroom if it was part of an operation. In the end your conclusions offer and say nothing.
Once again you commit rogue logical fallacies with casual indifference. Just because Black Tie Man was never identified doesn't mean he was a CIA forgery. He could have been one of the many conspirators that day known to be in the Plaza. That would make him real and there wouldn't it? It would make sense for a military intelligence or mafia guard to be at the front entrance to the Depository wouldn't it? What gets to me the most about the unbuttoned shirt is your refusal to answer whether those buttons were torn-off during Oswald's arrest? Otherwise there's no reason why Lovelady couldn't have had his shirt open too.
Hoover's reluctance could easily be explained by his imposing a refusal to look into any evidence besides the Sniper's Nest Lone Nut version. You are making self-serving suppositions that constitute nothing near the "proof" you claim.