04-01-2012, 09:26 PM
If we could bring your "photographic analysis" to this board we would see it is more of the same offerings from you of insisting features of Oswald's shirt are visible in blurry pictures of Loveday's shirt seen in Altgens. I don't see those features in your blow-ups. In the end, all it is is you insisting those features are there and using the same fractured logic you use in these posts to prove it. You are taking advantage of the similarity in the overall look of Lovelady's open shirt and tee shirt to Oswald's. This is exactly what those who insist Greer shot Kennedy do. They take advantage of the timing and movements between Greer turning around and Kennedy's head shot.
You failed to answer my points about Black Tie Man's face being half shaded by the lintel shade-line.
Oswald's russian was probably explainable by Armstrong's theory.
It wasn't risky at all for Oswald to lie. You have it completely backwards. If you did competent study of Oswald and his doings he made a career out of lying, and since he was a CIA asset there was very little downside to it. Your petty reasoning above grinds against the real curve here with Oswald. Oswald was lying at the Dallas police station. At the most critical time of his life he was coolly maintaining operational cover. Oswald's lies were just as risky as the Warren Commission's, for they were one in the same.
If Oswald was the Lone Nut shooter they wouldn't need to identify a bystander floors below. You seem to be ignoring what other evidence the Warren Commission ignored.
Good, you seem to be displaying awareness that it would be unlikely Oswald would wear a shirt with all the top buttons ripped-off to work, and that the scuffle at the theater would be the most likely place where those buttons would be torn off. Also, Oswald's landlady took care of Oswald's laundry. She probably would have mended such a shirt.
Realizing there would be a Depository roll-call Lovelady buttoned-up his shirt.
It is logically false to say Hoover's refusal to investigate Lovelady proves a CIA forgery of Altgens.
I'd say there's about 50/50 odds your intention of returning to your lemonade stand seminar on Altgens makes it past site standard enforcement.
You failed to answer my points about Black Tie Man's face being half shaded by the lintel shade-line.
Oswald's russian was probably explainable by Armstrong's theory.
It wasn't risky at all for Oswald to lie. You have it completely backwards. If you did competent study of Oswald and his doings he made a career out of lying, and since he was a CIA asset there was very little downside to it. Your petty reasoning above grinds against the real curve here with Oswald. Oswald was lying at the Dallas police station. At the most critical time of his life he was coolly maintaining operational cover. Oswald's lies were just as risky as the Warren Commission's, for they were one in the same.
If Oswald was the Lone Nut shooter they wouldn't need to identify a bystander floors below. You seem to be ignoring what other evidence the Warren Commission ignored.
Good, you seem to be displaying awareness that it would be unlikely Oswald would wear a shirt with all the top buttons ripped-off to work, and that the scuffle at the theater would be the most likely place where those buttons would be torn off. Also, Oswald's landlady took care of Oswald's laundry. She probably would have mended such a shirt.
Realizing there would be a Depository roll-call Lovelady buttoned-up his shirt.
It is logically false to say Hoover's refusal to investigate Lovelady proves a CIA forgery of Altgens.
I'd say there's about 50/50 odds your intention of returning to your lemonade stand seminar on Altgens makes it past site standard enforcement.