09-01-2012, 05:38 PM
Well fine but if people don't like you Jim, chances are they aren't going to like your arguments. I've had that before. Indeed I am guilty myself. But of course in your world you are the messiah. Who on earth starts rabbiting on about their University credentials when your behaviour and your reasoning. Not to mention your gullibilty for any new fad coming out of Langley makes people wonder if they are handing out Degrees in Cap 'n' Crunch boxes.
Further, weren't you trying to tell myself and the forum how much more 'exposure you had' and how insignificant CTKA was compared to the platforms you were on? Doesn't that neccessitate that you are more popular and weren't you trying lamely to brag about it?
A lot of other people have also studied what you have and come to different conclusions. Your viewpoint is not the only one on issues of fakery and so on. I tend to go with voices different to yours so do Jim and Lisa.
The points and arguments you make are nothing but a facade for misquoting and taking myself way out of context. Further as for Zap film alteration I might be wrong but I believe I never said that comment. In fact it was someone on one of the forums in the links I sent you. Depending on my mood I might agree or disagree with the sentiment. Irregardless by your peddling all manner of LBJ and false sponsors and John Hankey I agree with the sentiments expressed.
Further, weren't you trying to tell myself and the forum how much more 'exposure you had' and how insignificant CTKA was compared to the platforms you were on? Doesn't that neccessitate that you are more popular and weren't you trying lamely to brag about it?
A lot of other people have also studied what you have and come to different conclusions. Your viewpoint is not the only one on issues of fakery and so on. I tend to go with voices different to yours so do Jim and Lisa.
The points and arguments you make are nothing but a facade for misquoting and taking myself way out of context. Further as for Zap film alteration I might be wrong but I believe I never said that comment. In fact it was someone on one of the forums in the links I sent you. Depending on my mood I might agree or disagree with the sentiment. Irregardless by your peddling all manner of LBJ and false sponsors and John Hankey I agree with the sentiments expressed.
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992