Why no reply on George Bush Mr Fetzer?

[Seamus Coogan]

[/QUOTE] I do not disagree with any of those statements, except possibly 23, and that is just speculation on my part. I tried to find Hankey's video on JFK jr yesterday and could only find a piece on you tube. That piece dealt with many of the above statements, and I agree there is no evidence. The flight instructor issue is interesting if the valve was truned in a suicide mode, but he offers no proof that there was such a flight instructor except to say that John always flew with one. On other JFK Jr sites I have seen statements that say there was an explosion in the sky right where John's plane would have been. So yes I agree that Hankey makes mistakes that overall nearly destroy the value of his work. But I still think Baker did a good job on his Bush evidence. And the book overall. One of your concerns was that he did not go into certain areas, that you felt to be very relevent. One can always find this kind of fault with any book. My main complaint is that you, Seamus and others seem to be trying to ignore the role of the Bush family in these matters. I knew almost zero about Bush when Ford made him head of the CIA but that alone greatly aroused my suspicion given Ford's role in covering up the assassination of JFK. I will at some point re-read Baker's book together with your review.

Dawn[/QUOTE]

Cheers Dawn for going and re-evaluating some of the stuff. I'm prepared to have some back and forth when you get the time. I think the problem is that as you have said the facts in the case are sadly obscured by the arguments involved. So I understand where someone in your position is coming from. I'm just a bit of a sanguine lol. Anyhow, here's the Hankey stuff.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...9401330864