11-01-2012, 09:19 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Dawn,
Jim is not arguing that a head shot -- or shots -- did not occur.
He is arguing that the head shot AS SHOWN in the Z-film did not occur -- a position with which I tend to agree.
Obviously there were head shots. It is what killed him. The neck wound was likely not fatal. All the doctors describe a head shot that blew off his head. Then the autopsy pics have it put back together. Body alteration? Perhaps. Lifton made a good argument for it. Or fake pics, which would be a lot easier. No I have not read his work. I have read hundreds of books on the assassination of JFK. But I also work full time. I have no expertise in photo analysis and so I keep away from all of that. A lot of the time it is arguing over blobs that no one can really decifer. I have looked at the pic of the person some say is Bush in Dallas. It does look like him, but is also too faint and far away to really tell.
So to be clear CD you agree with Jim that there was no back and to the left shot? (I am finding this dizzying).
Dawn