14-01-2012, 09:44 PM
Bernice Moore Wrote:Albert; just my comment on what your post means , Perhaps i am in error, if so correct me please, but i take your post to mean that any who follow along with the Dr Fezer studies are bloody bonkers, FYI, there are quite a few then Bonkers. when you read anothers say book on the research into the assassinations, do you buy all verbatum, or do you proceed to then do your own research into such ?? do you question anything, or buy all blind, for your info there are areas where I differ with Jim and others studies, and many students are of the same mind, it seems to me quite an insulting title you wrote, you reminded me of one Bill Miller, and that's no compliment, who would post such derogatory titles and remarks on Rich's and the Simkins Forums...so just for your info, try not to use such a wide paint brush, and that also could be said of some others as well....thanks b..
I think it is clear enough from what is written. The specific case of the Depository steps alleged CIA forgery is easily debunked (as shown on Lancer). While I agree with the Deep Politics approach I personally feel it isn't too great an offense for those denizens of the Deep Politics Acropolis to chase-off obvious cranks like Dr Cinque from their temple steps. I'd personally be more worried about crackpot professors bringing contempt right into the heart of the inner sanctum of Assassination research than a title warning about it myself. This particular professor referred to a conspiracy theorist who uses the "STFU" vernacular as "brilliant". The wise should be careful of where protest is best spent in my opinion...