14-02-2012, 06:19 PM
Variations on the theme.
This could be about promotion of false Sponsorship and/or misdirection and misappropriation of investigative initiatives and energies.
The emergence of what has come to be known as our "critical community" had to have been anticipated pre-assassination by high-level Facilitators. For a host of reasons, some but hardly all of which surely overlapped, European intellectuals and Soviet intel planners could be counted upon to raise very public objections to an official LN conclusion. So too "fringe" domestic observers. Rather than fight the unwinnable battles to suppress these ideas and eliminate their originators, the cover-up Facilitators made the decisions to confuse, incite, disinform, misdirect, preempt, and/or buy off the individuals and groups who would challenge the central JFK assassination lie.
The greater goals would be to create first a national, and then a global pandemic of helplessness and political disenfranchisement in the face of power sufficiently fearsome to stage without fear of reprisal a public execution of a U.S. president and to enlist generations of his successors and, indeed, the permanent U.S. government into the cover-up.
The LAST thing desired by the Sponsors was consensus -- even if it were attainable.
Doubt breeds conflict among the masses.
The chances for successful control of the many by the few are heightened in direct proportion to the ability of the few to keep the many at each others' throats.
Back to our subject for examples of fatally debilitating internecine conflict:
Lancer v. COPA.
Competing ceremonies in Dealey on 11/22 anniversaries.
Z-film alterationists v. non-alterationists.
LHO v. BL Altgens 6 advocates.
Jim Fetzer v. the world.
DPF v. EF.
And those are just for starters.
Fifteen or a million years ago I asked, in an essay titled "In the Blossom of Our Sins," how we, as a community, define "justice" in this case.
As I type these words, said "justice" had been neither defined nor attained.
This could be about promotion of false Sponsorship and/or misdirection and misappropriation of investigative initiatives and energies.
The emergence of what has come to be known as our "critical community" had to have been anticipated pre-assassination by high-level Facilitators. For a host of reasons, some but hardly all of which surely overlapped, European intellectuals and Soviet intel planners could be counted upon to raise very public objections to an official LN conclusion. So too "fringe" domestic observers. Rather than fight the unwinnable battles to suppress these ideas and eliminate their originators, the cover-up Facilitators made the decisions to confuse, incite, disinform, misdirect, preempt, and/or buy off the individuals and groups who would challenge the central JFK assassination lie.
The greater goals would be to create first a national, and then a global pandemic of helplessness and political disenfranchisement in the face of power sufficiently fearsome to stage without fear of reprisal a public execution of a U.S. president and to enlist generations of his successors and, indeed, the permanent U.S. government into the cover-up.
The LAST thing desired by the Sponsors was consensus -- even if it were attainable.
Doubt breeds conflict among the masses.
The chances for successful control of the many by the few are heightened in direct proportion to the ability of the few to keep the many at each others' throats.
Back to our subject for examples of fatally debilitating internecine conflict:
Lancer v. COPA.
Competing ceremonies in Dealey on 11/22 anniversaries.
Z-film alterationists v. non-alterationists.
LHO v. BL Altgens 6 advocates.
Jim Fetzer v. the world.
DPF v. EF.
And those are just for starters.
Fifteen or a million years ago I asked, in an essay titled "In the Blossom of Our Sins," how we, as a community, define "justice" in this case.
As I type these words, said "justice" had been neither defined nor attained.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene