24-02-2012, 06:53 PM
As I predicted in the thread titled "The Rise of the Naifs: Fostering and Exploiting False Perceptions of DPF Vulnerabilities," DPF is being set up, via what by all appearances is a hostile operation, to be characterized as "home of closed and paranoid minds" -- and worse -- and subsequently marginalized.
( https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...rabilities )
Within the past 24 hours, the operation has entered into its second phase.
Remember that, over the past few months, DPF has been penetrated by a series of posters who either pose as JFK assassination neophytes and then begin the processes of relentlessly challenging long-settled issues, demonstrating knowledge of the case that a neophyte could not be expected to possess, and/or miring the forum in useless, repetitive, violently espoused arguments about nothing, and/or pitting experienced and honorable researchers against each other as a way to shatter this community.
Phase Two -- attacks on DPF founders based upon our outing and banning of real and de facto agents provocateur -- began earlier today when former member Trowbridge H. Ford sent the DPF founders the following message (in bold italics):
Just dropped by to see how the site is doing, and I believe it is doing very badly. making me think that IT is run by disinformation agents.
Your continuing fights with Fetzer, Cinque, and now Ortiz makes me think that you are too busy getting mirrors of yourself rather than really naming who plotted JFK's and other assassinations.
Makes me think that you had a profile on me, explaining why David Guyatt, Peter Presland and Charles Drago immediately picked fights with me, and decided that I was just another one - what is certainly not true.
Won't even attempt to come back anytime soon.
You people are just problems, not solutions, as I suggested to Charles when he went after me for stating that Marks apparently showed that LHO had been unsuccessfully hypnotized in July 1963 to kill JFK.
Bye, goons!
As Jan Klimkowski reminds us, Ford is "'former' Counter- and Military Intelligence."
Watch this carefully. Form your own opinions. Learn.
( https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...rabilities )
Within the past 24 hours, the operation has entered into its second phase.
Remember that, over the past few months, DPF has been penetrated by a series of posters who either pose as JFK assassination neophytes and then begin the processes of relentlessly challenging long-settled issues, demonstrating knowledge of the case that a neophyte could not be expected to possess, and/or miring the forum in useless, repetitive, violently espoused arguments about nothing, and/or pitting experienced and honorable researchers against each other as a way to shatter this community.
Phase Two -- attacks on DPF founders based upon our outing and banning of real and de facto agents provocateur -- began earlier today when former member Trowbridge H. Ford sent the DPF founders the following message (in bold italics):
Just dropped by to see how the site is doing, and I believe it is doing very badly. making me think that IT is run by disinformation agents.
Your continuing fights with Fetzer, Cinque, and now Ortiz makes me think that you are too busy getting mirrors of yourself rather than really naming who plotted JFK's and other assassinations.
Makes me think that you had a profile on me, explaining why David Guyatt, Peter Presland and Charles Drago immediately picked fights with me, and decided that I was just another one - what is certainly not true.
Won't even attempt to come back anytime soon.
You people are just problems, not solutions, as I suggested to Charles when he went after me for stating that Marks apparently showed that LHO had been unsuccessfully hypnotized in July 1963 to kill JFK.
Bye, goons!
As Jan Klimkowski reminds us, Ford is "'former' Counter- and Military Intelligence."
Watch this carefully. Form your own opinions. Learn.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene