Armstrong's Hypothosis - Harvey and Lee - Applied to Tippit

[Peter Lemkin]

Peter this book has intrigued me for some time now. However I know there are some strong critiques of his work. Is there any way that you could summarize these critiques in a big picture kind of way-- I mean while being fair. Also do you think that parts of the book can stand even if you end up agreeing with the main critiques?

Realize this is sort of a whimpy request but this book is not easy to get and wondering if I should make the effort.

And once the book is obtained it's not easy to read.

I didn't find his book hard to read, but it is NOT the kind one reads more than a few pages of at a time and then stop to think and digest it. It is extremely dense with information - much not to be had anywhere else. Yes, the Tippit piece is a microcosm of the book and its style. Sadly, there was much more information he found he never committed to the book. It certainly puts to bed the idea that Oswald was a loner, a nut, or the assassin - in fact it refutes most everything in the official version - or makes it very suspect in as to how it was 'spun' by the authorities.

Jack, Any chance he will return to this matter or put what other information he has in the public realm at some point?

At some point John's materials may be available at a university.

Jack

That's great to hear. I know he has 'washed his hands' of this for now, but if you're in contact with him kindly let him know many would love for him to return to his labor of love - no matter the pain - the NATION needs it more than ever!