13-03-2012, 05:32 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:The elephant in the room with Thornley is whether "Brother In Law" was E Howard Hunt? This seems to be traceable since brother in law was the alleged relative of Slim Brooks who was a member of Banister's Anti-Communist League. This seems like simple research work to trace whether brother in law actually was Hunt. Just from what he says it looks like brother in law was too close to New Orleans and nearby, according to Thornley's recounting, to actually be Hunt since Hunt was located in Washington. In a way it doesn't matter if brother in law was Hunt or not since Thornley had close interface with the Garrison New Orleans cabal.
Thornley is another Oswald-type who flips from Ayn Rand capitalist "objectivist" to being on Castro's side if Nixon killed JFK. Maybe the fact Thornley wasn't killed indicates his proximity to the cabal.
Ya his living to "tell all" is telling. Also I just can't imagine that many people were wandering around talking with others about how much they wanted to kill JFK. That he seems quite well read is interesting, but his tale also seems to reek of Files crap to me, only more intelligent...His proximity to "LHO" would give him motive to read up and make up, to my way of thinking. Lots of young poeple, including myself, were into Rand til they grew up and realized how the world works, at about age 20 for me. His ties ins with the Watergave stuff seems all too contrived as well. I did not listen past vid 7.
Dawn