19-03-2012, 04:40 PM
This is some of the most wicked, close to the bone, limited hang-out disinformation you could imagine. Sure Castro may have done that but only in response to CIA sheep-dipping Oswald before the assassination - which shows premeditation and conspiracy.
The evidence for CIA complicity has become so strong that we are down to two culprits with one sticking the evidence in the other's pocket upon apprehension.
This bs is simply answered. The Mexico City embassy happenings were a well-known set-up of Oswald by CIA. Any information Castro received from this incident was something he was intended to receive according to CIA plans. The simple details of this are shown in Mark Lane's book 'Last Word: My Indictment Of CIA In The Murder Of JFK'.
This example of disinformation shows the critical role useful American idiots play in the permanent government's control of this country.
The evidence for CIA complicity has become so strong that we are down to two culprits with one sticking the evidence in the other's pocket upon apprehension.
This bs is simply answered. The Mexico City embassy happenings were a well-known set-up of Oswald by CIA. Any information Castro received from this incident was something he was intended to receive according to CIA plans. The simple details of this are shown in Mark Lane's book 'Last Word: My Indictment Of CIA In The Murder Of JFK'.
This example of disinformation shows the critical role useful American idiots play in the permanent government's control of this country.