JFK Jr

[Seamus Coogan]

Bullshit alert: http://www.rense.com/general78/reas.htm It's not that I don't have questions about JFK Jr's death. I do. But this is the kind of ridiculous, one-person-said without any documentary evidence whatsoever crap that exhibits the worst of the worst re conspiracy theory. Anyone can make this stuff up, and plenty of idiots will fall for it. I'm not sure whether Hankey is inventing this or falling for it - but either way, it's useless crap that does not raise to even a minor level of credibility. Move along. Don't waste your time.


The Reason JFK Jr Was Murdered

www.rense.com

Lisa just pasted this comment on her FB page concerning Hankeys JFK Jr stuff.

Seamus,

Suffice to say: You have a lot of research to do before I will take you seriously on this issue. I am CERTAIN that I have done more primary research on this subject than...errr--anyone I know of besides Sherman Skolnick with whom I collaborated, Scott Myers with whom I collaborated separately, and John DiNardo...

Sometimes the appearance of impropriety is just that--ONLY an appearance.

So what is Greg trying to say here? I really like GB. But sometimes as is the case here folks my frustration boils over and I think I have a fairly decent excuse to get a little bit ratty. Though I don't actually think GB was really meaning to tick me off or offend me throughout this thread. However folks it is what he has invariably done.

So here goes.

Greg is effectively saying that I am hiding behind some 'impropriety' on behalf of individuals like himself and Dawn. Why? It seems to Greg that its some ruse to get myself out of some sticky research corners concerning JFK Jr.

Am I reading that assertion correctly Greg?

This thread was not intended as an IQ test for forum members. Help, if it was some people have failed rather dismally. This is a bit of a shame, I find Greg to be a very intelligent individual...at least most of the time.

If one peruses this thread folks, it's pretty obvious that Greg failed to understand a number of simple explanations I gave repeatedly. He then blamed it all on my being from NZ. Yes sadly he reduced himself to making what I felt to be petty racist slurs. However, a number of people including the mods here have been able to translate what I have been trying to say. Namely 'I have not done any research on JFK Jr at CTKA in no way shape or form'.

What part of other people getting my point you did not Greg?

Further that, what research on JFK Jr do I have to do before you trust me on the issue? I trust Lisa Pease. Take it out on her. Unless you read carefully GB, that comment was actually taken from Lisa's FB page.

What Greg doesn't get is this. JFK Jr, bar the odd comment, is not an issue I have given much thought about. I am very comfortable in saying so. Greg is trying to imply somehow that 'I am' or 'I should be'. However, I have been trying to tell Greg (on a number of occasions throughout this thread as you have seen) that I have always found Lisa Pease's writings on the JFK Jr topic rather intriguing. Considering Hankey's track record on GWB I prefer her take on the topic rather than his. Is that so damn hard for you to figure out Greg? Is it so hard for you to comprehend, that people with minimal interest can believe in something fishy going in the JFK Jr arena without endorsing John Hankeys version of events? Or is that concept just to abstract for you?

Well Greg if that was to left field for you, you then the next part will totally blow your mind.

Lisa also believes some spooky stuff went down. Yes, Greg she does! Isn't that exciting?

For all Gregs research on the topic he has obviously never read Lisa's take on it. Instead he seems to think I was using her opinion on Hankey too simply flay JFK Jr conspiracy believers. And Greg accuses me of making knee jerk reactions? What part of hypocrisy don't you get Greg?

One day Greg (when I have time or the inclination) I would very much like to read what you have on the JFK Jr case. Indeed all you needed to say was "Hey Seamus check out my stuff on JFK Jr or if you have any questions ask me?" You know, it's a pretty nice way of getting people interested in what you have to say. As it is Greg I am just going to have too 'trust' that your writings display more intelligence than anything you have posted here during the last few days.

Maybe an idea would be to post your JFK Jr stuff on another thread (omitting any reference to myself)?

Do you get me or is this idea all just a little to much for you?

In case you don't get my request to post JFK Jr stuff on another thread I also have some other requests.

Greg could you please tell me what the working title of this very thread is? Greg can you understand this question?

Greg please tell me and the other posters here where I put JFK Jr in that thread bar denying any involvement in the study of JFK Jr? Once again can you understand this question?

Greg for the final time it was DAWN who bought up this JFK Jr stuff. Can you understand this simple little point Greg?

Greg please tell me about quality versus quantity in the JFK debate...That was the key topic in my opening post on this thread. Did you read that post? You clearly failed to see that I actually congratulated yourself, Don and Dawn for not letting Morrow and Cahalan's bollocks on the Ed Forum turn it into a pathetic tirade against CTKA.

Greg can you understand my grave concerns about your levels of comprehension? Can you understand why myself and some others would have these concerns?

Can you grasp for one small second why I am a tad frustrated with your comments?