27-03-2009, 03:30 AM
Myra Bronstein Wrote:So lately I've replied "oh you're one of those coincidence theorists."
This is tantamount to surrender insofar as it implicitly levels the playing field for our truth and their lies.
Speaking only of the JFK assassination: Conspiracy is not a "theory." It is a fact.
To reiterate: Anyone with reasonable access to the JFK evidence who does not conclude conspiracy is cognitively impaired and/or complicit in the crime.
If we are dealing with an individual who does not have reasonable access to the evidence, then we are obliged to begin our recitation of how things happened in Dallas with something along the lines of, "What you are about to learn is no longer subject to debate. It is historical truth. It is not my 'opinion' or my 'belief' that JFK died at the hands of conspirators. It is my certain knowledge."
There is not a scintilla of legitimate evidence to support the LN theory/lie.
Absent the post-shooting actions of Mrs. Kennedy, there were no tender mercies in evidence in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963. It is high time that we return the fire.
Remember to focus on the "how" question of the Kennedy murder -- answered simply and truthfully with, "by criminal conspirators."
As for the "who" and "why" queries: Honorable debate continues -- but the field of reasonable answers shrinks almost daily.
We are at war with the killers of John Fitzgerald Kennedy -- and with their accessories after the fact.
An equally easy-to-demonstrate conspiracy -- even for the controlled?
The Founding Fathers' plot.
The Lincoln hit.
The Reichstag fire.
Valkyrie.
The assassination of Yamamoto.
The looting of Banco Ambrosiano.
The Black Sox Scandal.
Watergate.
The assassination of Julius Caesar.
For starters.