The Danger Of The Fetzer Assassination School

[Albert Doyle]

Any chance someone would post a link to this on the EF? I'm trying to show that Cinque can be cut down by the facts alone:


Proof Cinque Is A Moron



Although he has had this explained to him many times, Cinque is back demanding answers to his "four shoulder" theory on EF. It has already been explained that the movie cuts to the Lovelady room well after the clear still frame. The movie shot starts a few seconds after the still frame so what it presents can not be compared to the movie images. Yet Dr Cinque incompetently attempts to do so anyway, even after having this explained several times. Even worse, he takes a blurry shot of the clock and says it shows 2 o'clock "sharp". This is inherently moronic because you can't see the several seconds that have ticked-off on that clock between the still frame and the movie clip. Dr Cinque is a certifiable moron because he doesn't realize the still frame, because it is a few seconds earlier, conceals the lead cop behind the others. A sharp eye will see the brim of the white cap coming out from the edge of the head of the man in front of him. The only issue here is Dr Cinque's moronic inability to interpret photos and his moronic inability to comprehend explanations when they are given. The tall cop with the white cap IS there. Cinque is just too incompetent and too zealous to force quack theories to understand why.

To continue his abject moronacy, Cinque argues that the cop was always there in the video so he isn't concealed by the others. However anyone with even the most basic common sense would see right away that the clearer still frame is obviously a second or two prior to the video clip. So this alone defeats what Dr Cinque is claiming. I hate to put it this way but the reason Dr Cinque doesn't realize it is because he's dumb. That's the whole problem here I'm afraid. The still shot is from further back in the video where the cops were all lined-up. It was edited-out from the Craig insert video.

Again, Cinque shows an almost retarded level of understanding because he then insists that the video is a later frame and can't be compared. He does this while moronically not realizing his own words disprove his theory. This alone shows the crazy lack of grasp Dr Cinque has on this subject or the necessary logic involved. YES, the video is a later series a frames that cannot be compared to the earlier still frame. We are both saying the same thing - one understanding it, the other not.

There are NOT two different Lovelady's shown here. Cinque has had the aspect ratio explanation told to him so many times he's practically been hit over the head with it. Yet, despite all this, he still offers his moronic conclusions while pretending not to notice. The video has a squeezed aspect ratio in the picture on picture backdrop projection. The still frame of the thicker Lovelady is an isolated frame from the same movie that hasn't had its aspect ratio squeezed. That's why it's clearer and why Lovelady looks thicker. If you'll notice, both the unsqueezed Martin Film and police station film both show a "thick" Lovelady. The picture in picture video shows a thinner Lovelady because of a squeezed aspect ratio.

I submit that Dr Cinque, because of his clinical moronic condition, will not be able to understand this explanation. So therefore I suggest he be failed on the subject and dismissed as would any student who just didn't understand things when explained. No need to involve philosophy or manners with this obnoxious nitwit.