16-05-2012, 11:54 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:I'm not certainly not going to "rule" on anything here.
I am going to toss out a few more observations.
Plenty of members have been given a robust and challenging ride at DPF.
It's not a kindergarten, and it's not a polite debating society.
The personalities of members are pretty obvious to anyone who's been around for a while, and we all have different tolerance thresholds.
In my Mod hat, I considered getting involved in the recent exchange between Charles and Lauren. Within a short period of time, Charles and Lauren worked it out between them.
However, the stunts that Cinque and Fetzer, and Morrow and Fetzer, have recently pulled at DPF and other sites are of a different order all together.
I have called them Sunsteinian psyops, and I make no apology for this. This does not mean that they are necessarily Sponsored or Facilitated by an intelligence entity. However, it does mean that they achieve precisely the same purposes that a Sunsteinian operation would.
Namely:
- the disruption of serious research
- the banalization of serious research
- the relentless promulgation of hypotheses after they have been thoroughly debunked
- the publicizing of those hypotheses in arenas likely to get MSM attention
- the knowledge that these hypotheses and their chief protagonists (Cinque, Morrow) will not survive basic due diligence from MSM researchers
All serving the End Purpose of a Sunsteinian psyop: To delegitimize research which challenges officially sanctioned history, and to enable MSM to say "Look - this is why you can't trust conspiracy theorists".
DPF debunked Morrow and Fetzer's LBJ-did-it hypothesis.
DPF debunked Cinque and Fetzer's wacky-photo hypothesis.
When their disruption continued, DPF banned Morrow and Cinque.
In my considered judgement, this was and remains an absoutely correct decision.
As, you might guess, it also does in mine.
A certain deep political naif in a position of authority at the Deep Political Science ungraded room known as the EF has described the DPF actions herein referenced by Jan as "narrowing and restricting" acts. This person asks, presumably rhetorically, if DPF "is a better place for its narrowness, than [the EF] is, for its openness?"
In this person's defensive description of the simple-minded, naive EF policies that allow entities the likes of "Cinque" and "Morrow" and "Colby" free rein to act as agents provocateur and thus do great harm to our efforts on behalf of truth and justice as "openness" may be discerned the fatal flaw in his character and the EF's charter.
This young man who in his insufferably long and vacuous posts routinely conflates quantity with quality apparently does not understand that we are at war with the killers of JFK, MLK, RFK, and Malcolm X, plus other victims numbering in the millions. He apparently is of the belief that we are all engaged in polite academic discourse and debate.
He is a fool, of course. A fool of the worst sort: the sort who ends up killing his friends with kindness.