18-05-2012, 08:17 AM
Jeffrey
It seems that the website is the book. Even better. I read the columnar précis and find the final paragraphs killer:
BEGIN EXCERPT
The main thesis is that there is no fact-based historic record of the collapses. The true collapse modes of the Twin Towers is not accurately determined within any academic, professional or government literature. It is described incorrectly within history as it is being written. There are, however, millions of people that are falsly certain they know what happened because they believe verifiably incorrect authoritative statements and their own pre-conceived beliefs.
Direct measurements extracted from the visual record of the collapses grossly contradict history as it is generally presented. A record of measurements and documented observables of all 3 collapsed buildings on a level far more intricate than that which previously existed has been presented. The record is verifiably superior to and grossly contradicted by the record provided by U.S. Government agencies.
In reality there is no scientific approach and, therefore, no technical history of the collapses at all. This is a verifiable statement.
END EXCERPT
I believe the site contains the book, combines outline and table of content with linked sections at left. A seemingly invaluable resource.
I approach the event with a deep distrust of the suspicious abuse FBI administered the messenger, John O'Neill. Also, Colleen Rowley. I posit advanced knowledge a la OK Bomb, and coverup a la TWA 800. And Waco.
The site/book says ten years on there is no explanation of the collapse, hence no improvement in building codes.
We have a shocking unprecedented triple collapse, unexplainedbut trust us, it was hot in there, things got squishy, all fall down.
Alright, that is the official pronouncement.
I see the name Jim Fetzer mentioned. I recall he found Judy Woods compelling. I heard her breathlessly telling George Noory on Coast to Coast AM of "microwave like weapons" which made the people jump from the windows, which caused the "dustification" of the structure.
Do we (the national security state) possess such weaponry? Why bother sending troops to die in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Nuke them from orbit; it's the only way to be sure."
So we have two unacceptable alternatives loudly crowding out reason, tiring the public mind, having the desired anesthetic effect.
A parallel to the operation mounted by Fetzer and Cinque on the "Education Forum" which seeks to jam the airwaves and make the audience turn off the set.
Approaching the event from the standpoint of what did it gain a construct called Al Qaeda, why, only to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.
Which Yamamoto never said, but was written into Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970).
And ten years on, the official cause of the collapses is no better sourced.
OK Bomb. 911. TWA 800. We have official cartoons. We have straw man cartoons.
A series of kabuki plays. Designed to confuse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzrUqAtUcpU
It seems that the website is the book. Even better. I read the columnar précis and find the final paragraphs killer:
BEGIN EXCERPT
The main thesis is that there is no fact-based historic record of the collapses. The true collapse modes of the Twin Towers is not accurately determined within any academic, professional or government literature. It is described incorrectly within history as it is being written. There are, however, millions of people that are falsly certain they know what happened because they believe verifiably incorrect authoritative statements and their own pre-conceived beliefs.
Direct measurements extracted from the visual record of the collapses grossly contradict history as it is generally presented. A record of measurements and documented observables of all 3 collapsed buildings on a level far more intricate than that which previously existed has been presented. The record is verifiably superior to and grossly contradicted by the record provided by U.S. Government agencies.
In reality there is no scientific approach and, therefore, no technical history of the collapses at all. This is a verifiable statement.
END EXCERPT
I believe the site contains the book, combines outline and table of content with linked sections at left. A seemingly invaluable resource.
I approach the event with a deep distrust of the suspicious abuse FBI administered the messenger, John O'Neill. Also, Colleen Rowley. I posit advanced knowledge a la OK Bomb, and coverup a la TWA 800. And Waco.
The site/book says ten years on there is no explanation of the collapse, hence no improvement in building codes.
We have a shocking unprecedented triple collapse, unexplainedbut trust us, it was hot in there, things got squishy, all fall down.
Alright, that is the official pronouncement.
I see the name Jim Fetzer mentioned. I recall he found Judy Woods compelling. I heard her breathlessly telling George Noory on Coast to Coast AM of "microwave like weapons" which made the people jump from the windows, which caused the "dustification" of the structure.
Do we (the national security state) possess such weaponry? Why bother sending troops to die in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Nuke them from orbit; it's the only way to be sure."
So we have two unacceptable alternatives loudly crowding out reason, tiring the public mind, having the desired anesthetic effect.
A parallel to the operation mounted by Fetzer and Cinque on the "Education Forum" which seeks to jam the airwaves and make the audience turn off the set.
Approaching the event from the standpoint of what did it gain a construct called Al Qaeda, why, only to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.
Which Yamamoto never said, but was written into Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970).
And ten years on, the official cause of the collapses is no better sourced.
OK Bomb. 911. TWA 800. We have official cartoons. We have straw man cartoons.
A series of kabuki plays. Designed to confuse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzrUqAtUcpU