18-05-2012, 04:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-05-2012, 11:45 AM by Jeffrey Orling.)
I was asked to join the board in late Fall '09 and was appointed as Gage's liaison to the various *teams* such as video, graphics, verifications, web and so forth. The teams worked toward getting the AE911T message out which was essentially the Blueprint for Truth.
Before joining I had not closely examined the document and assumed the evidence was vetted and *peer reviewed* so like most I simply assumed it all to be factual.
I did not find the destruction of the twin towers resembled in any manner any controlled demolition... aside from in the grossest way... collapses... here one moment, gone the next.. lots of dust. I suggested that since they were not *classical CDs, AE911T use the term *engineered destruction* which is what a CD is any way. Gage and board member Deets liked the idea... Cole, Keogh and other non board members thought changing the term would destroy their credibility.. You simply don't change message... bad strategy. My idea was read as a sign that I was an agent sent in to destroy AE911T from within.
There were other details which essentially boiled down to a litmus test for board members and volunteers... the test being you support 100% BFT and all AE911T talking points... nano thermite and so forth. At the time I was advocating that AE911T call upon its professional signers to do a detailed performance study of the design, figure out how the towers can be *de constructed* or where the weak points would be... since these are what any demolition team would exploit. I wanted AE911T to do a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and so forth. Gage and others thought this was a waste of time as they had the smoking gun evidence of CD... (Blueprint for Truth bullet points)
I planned the AE911T 1000 signer press conference and then there was a revolt of volunteers who demanded I be ousted from the board and the organization.... as a infiltrator and spy. They went on strike and refused to work and the board proposed a grievance process which would take place AFTER the press conference and after the volunteers got back to work. They refused.
Cole and Keogh then engineered a change in the by laws allowing removal of a board member without cause, added Kevin Ryan and immediately voted me out with the new simple majority requirement instead of a super majority as before. Poof I was gone.
Then I began to do my own independent research and *fact checking*. When I found problems I sent them to Gage and even went to meet him personally in Livingston Manor NY to aprise him of the findings. He showed no interest. He continued to make incorrect statements such as... there was dust from 4-12" thick for miles around the site covering Manhattan... despite being told they were gross exaggerations. He apparently doesn't care... and has no interest in the truth about those collapses. He's got a career promoting his organization and their views and is paid handsomely to do so... travelling the world on an expense account.
Before joining I had not closely examined the document and assumed the evidence was vetted and *peer reviewed* so like most I simply assumed it all to be factual.
I did not find the destruction of the twin towers resembled in any manner any controlled demolition... aside from in the grossest way... collapses... here one moment, gone the next.. lots of dust. I suggested that since they were not *classical CDs, AE911T use the term *engineered destruction* which is what a CD is any way. Gage and board member Deets liked the idea... Cole, Keogh and other non board members thought changing the term would destroy their credibility.. You simply don't change message... bad strategy. My idea was read as a sign that I was an agent sent in to destroy AE911T from within.
There were other details which essentially boiled down to a litmus test for board members and volunteers... the test being you support 100% BFT and all AE911T talking points... nano thermite and so forth. At the time I was advocating that AE911T call upon its professional signers to do a detailed performance study of the design, figure out how the towers can be *de constructed* or where the weak points would be... since these are what any demolition team would exploit. I wanted AE911T to do a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and so forth. Gage and others thought this was a waste of time as they had the smoking gun evidence of CD... (Blueprint for Truth bullet points)
I planned the AE911T 1000 signer press conference and then there was a revolt of volunteers who demanded I be ousted from the board and the organization.... as a infiltrator and spy. They went on strike and refused to work and the board proposed a grievance process which would take place AFTER the press conference and after the volunteers got back to work. They refused.
Cole and Keogh then engineered a change in the by laws allowing removal of a board member without cause, added Kevin Ryan and immediately voted me out with the new simple majority requirement instead of a super majority as before. Poof I was gone.
Then I began to do my own independent research and *fact checking*. When I found problems I sent them to Gage and even went to meet him personally in Livingston Manor NY to aprise him of the findings. He showed no interest. He continued to make incorrect statements such as... there was dust from 4-12" thick for miles around the site covering Manhattan... despite being told they were gross exaggerations. He apparently doesn't care... and has no interest in the truth about those collapses. He's got a career promoting his organization and their views and is paid handsomely to do so... travelling the world on an expense account.