18-05-2012, 11:54 PM
Jeffrey
We've seen the cartoon created by the CIA to promote the center fuel tank explosion explanation for a disaster described by scores of witnesses as initiated by a missile.
A radar plot shows a fast boat leaving the scene as others raced to the rescue. The FBI took the lead, Kallstrom assured us there was no evidence of a missile, even as tests showed otherwise, and contrarians were jailed.
In the event under discussion the official version maintains burning fuel weakened steel initiating collapse, while contrarians insist upon either controlled demolition or particle beam weaponry not described in the current literature.
I've bookmarked the site which is extensive. In reading Thy Will Be Done the authors require over 900 pages to outline the role of Nelson Rockefeller in the exploitation of South America's Amazon region.
The commission to study the 911 events seems to have been as helpful as the Warren Commission in understanding the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
As a corollary, the speculation, no, stipulation, by a Judy Woods of a microwave like weapon causing the dustification of the towers is also not helpful.
Somehow Charlton Heston has parted the sea of Jello opinion into the ridiculous and the absurd.
Let me be clear: in my view it was an engineered casus belli to control 90% of the world's heroin and to stimulate the sale of arms and for other purposes.
The enabling by Gorelick's Wall, allowing FBI and CIA to become a Janus of ignorance was essential. O'Neill was sidelined by FBI. No-flies flew.
And I suggest the planes were important and some other measures were taken in the manner of providing multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza.
No doubt many insist the planes didn't exist or were inconsequential in other than decoy or distraction terms a la Sirhan the dog barking on the boundary line of the basketball court allowing the shooter an unobstructed trajectory to the basket.
I look forward to a careful unpacking of the data.
We've seen the cartoon created by the CIA to promote the center fuel tank explosion explanation for a disaster described by scores of witnesses as initiated by a missile.
A radar plot shows a fast boat leaving the scene as others raced to the rescue. The FBI took the lead, Kallstrom assured us there was no evidence of a missile, even as tests showed otherwise, and contrarians were jailed.
In the event under discussion the official version maintains burning fuel weakened steel initiating collapse, while contrarians insist upon either controlled demolition or particle beam weaponry not described in the current literature.
I've bookmarked the site which is extensive. In reading Thy Will Be Done the authors require over 900 pages to outline the role of Nelson Rockefeller in the exploitation of South America's Amazon region.
The commission to study the 911 events seems to have been as helpful as the Warren Commission in understanding the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
As a corollary, the speculation, no, stipulation, by a Judy Woods of a microwave like weapon causing the dustification of the towers is also not helpful.
Somehow Charlton Heston has parted the sea of Jello opinion into the ridiculous and the absurd.
Let me be clear: in my view it was an engineered casus belli to control 90% of the world's heroin and to stimulate the sale of arms and for other purposes.
The enabling by Gorelick's Wall, allowing FBI and CIA to become a Janus of ignorance was essential. O'Neill was sidelined by FBI. No-flies flew.
And I suggest the planes were important and some other measures were taken in the manner of providing multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza.
No doubt many insist the planes didn't exist or were inconsequential in other than decoy or distraction terms a la Sirhan the dog barking on the boundary line of the basketball court allowing the shooter an unobstructed trajectory to the basket.
I look forward to a careful unpacking of the data.