New 911 Book - What happened and why we don't know what happend!

[Lauren Johnson]

Lauren,

You want to discuss a highly complex technical event... I'm up for it. You give up because you apparently cannot discuss any of the physics, engineering or even the actually observations.

Talk about a slam. Ufda.

What is the evidence you believe is irrefutable in support of controlled demolition... that is... evidence could not be from a non CD cause?

You've been studying this for several years you wrote... you must have learned something to convince you... It won't hurt... say it.

Jeffrey, we approach this from very different directions. You don't like it. As I understand yours, you say ROOSD is possible. Since there is no compelling evidence for CD, therefore it is likely that the buildings came down by ROOSD, even though there were some aspects of inside job involved.

I see a Gestalt -- a made for television special that was over in a couple of hours with instant re-runs sponsored by trans-national interests. The buildings had to come for this to work. Damaged buildings sitting there with nosy inspectors crawling all over them, all kinds of forensic personnel, news camera teams, etc. Worse, the question of who was at fault would have been much harder to suppress. What a nightmare that would have been. The buildings had to be down quickly.

I find the evidence presented by high school teacher Mr. Chandler, AE911T, etc. sufficient and compelling. It turns on evidence that you denigrate and that I find compelling. We have to agree to disagree.

Is ROOSD possible? I guess. How would I know.

I do note that your point of view has not attracted a lot of attention. I await more commentary from Phil "The Poet" Dragoo.