23-05-2012, 12:37 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-05-2012, 02:08 AM by Charles Drago.)
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Sorry, you need to take off your DP glasses at times...
Utter nonsense. "DP glasses" must be worn constantly -- even when they reveal that an event being scrutinized is not deep political in nature. How else could such a determination be made?
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:And I don't care what Drago has to teach about this.
Nor does Drago care if you choose to remain ignorant on matters highly relevant to the investigation of 9-11. Your analyses of that deep political event will be valued accordingly.
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:However when it comes to technical matters, mechanics, physics, engineering, optics and so forth deep politics has not standing.
Utter nonsense. We are about the application of the deep political scientific method shaped by deep political scientific rigor. Or at least we should be.
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Science approaches events without a political view.
Utter nonsense. "Science" is nothing but a tool. Those wielding it, regardless of their perspectives and levels of expertise, do the "approaching." Those doing the approaching are human beings. The objective, non-political human being has yet to be born.
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:It explains the world in the most objective manner, repeatable, testable and reliable. Not subject to interpretation of opinion. Not left, right or center.
Utter nonsense. "Science" explains nothing. Scientists -- including deep political scientists -- utilizing the scientific method offer hypotheses.
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:Means motive and opportunity are all political and not technical. They are not evidence about the technical event.
Utter nonsense. Deep political science-informed investigations of "means motive and opportunity" [sic] related to events that likely are deep political in nature are critical components of the searches for truth.
Further, does scientist Jane Goodall analyze means, motive, and opportunity when observing, quantifying, qualifying, and hypothesizing about primate behavior?
Jeffrey Orling Wrote:You guys can't figure out the technical issues because of your ideological blinders.
Utter nonsense. "You guys"?
So I ask Brother Orling again -- and yes, the question is loaded: Tell us what you know DID NOT happen on 9-11.
And don't give us guys any rhetorical bullshit answer along the lines of "I know the Three Stooges didn't bring down those buildings."
Do you assess the events of 9-11 as being deep political in nature?
Do you concur with the official U.S. government 9-11 conspiracy theory?
If you do, please defend it.
I you don't, in whole or in part, please explain.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene