24-05-2012, 02:42 PM
Seamus Coogan Wrote:He does have back up from Jim Di on this one.
Huge mistake on Jim's behalf IMO. It must originate from the fact he hasn't paid attention to Cinque, his content, or methods before reacting. That JimD would not see the millstone of being seen in public as Cinque's defender is something that can't work in his favor in any circumstances - no matter how objective a basis Jim protests on.
Cinque's delusion mainly depends on his aggrandizing on Lovelady's shirt being loose and hanging open. The only reason it appears that way is because he's leaning forward while hanging onto the railing, causing it to hang forward from his body because it is unbuttoned. Cinque refuses to acknowledge this.
If you look, both Cinque and Fetzer never touched my explanation of the Fritz notes. Any reasonable examination of the Fritz notes shows they can't be interpreted the way Fetzer interprets them - which is why Fetzer stays away from my post on the Fritz notes.
And now Fetzer has posted an entry by Cinque in absentia where Cinque turns all his failures into a claim that this latest proof actually backs his claim that the Lovelady in the police station Buck Film is fake!
Cinque is a registered moron who doesn't comprehend that the film frames he is comparing exist at different points in time and therefore can't be compared.