27-05-2012, 01:06 AM
Albert Doyle Wrote:I think JimD makes a mistake in not realizing CIA was hypnotizing people like Sirhan and Chapman into being Manchurian Candidate assassins at the time. So why couldn't Crump be some version of the same? Picking a criminal sociopath like Crump to be the patsy would only work in their favor. Oswald and Chapman, and even Sirhan, were loser profiled to make them easily scapegoat-able. Crump would be perfect. I think Jim is making a mistake here and not seeing a classic kill team, including Mitchell. The shots gave it away. Meyer was killed by surgical kill shots to the back of the head and heart. This is a methodology that fits CIA needing a critical witness dead. It is not the methodology of a cheap rape/robbery jogging path crook.
Of course Jim Di knows that stuff lol. But when you get Jim Di and Lisa Pease saying something is a crock of shite like Janney is. I'm sorry to say your going into chronic over kill mate! Crump could just have been a psychopath and Meyer could have been at the wrong place at the wrong time. Sometimes as Magda says "A cigar is just a cigar".
"In the Kennedy assassination we must be careful of running off into the ether of our own imaginations." Carl Ogelsby circa 1992