05-06-2012, 09:28 PM
Charles bounces a dambuster off this opening of Jeffrey's:
I agree that the gov... and corporations tell the story they choose to and it is often not the truth. The question we need to ask is why? I think we can discard the idea that their lies were simply an innocent errors.
Getting into the interlocking terminology and teleology, we learn the structure of a building and of a heirarchy's hidden hand.
Bundy was in the government but was not the government.
Lansdale was in the military but was not the military.
Dulles et al were in the CIA but were not the CIA.
I am learning to look at the critical fifteen seconds and seeing what has not been described until now.
We have all been hypnotized into "seeing" the assassination as an isolated event with a simple, crude, and false sponsor.
The government is simply one of a pile of discarded theories, much as the theories of the collapse have not held up under scrutiny.
A conspiracy which escapes detection is a successful one.
One not reliant upon institutional constructs or ephemeral political personae.
I posit the two analyses have much in common.
Three towers fell and two wars of greater than decade length ensued to the ends of unnamed sponsors.
I posit their collapse was foreordained and the means have not been identified.
John O'Neill was attempting to warn, was sidelined, humiliated, and crushed within their rubble.
I find continuing satisfaction in the study of the flow of capital and heroin and particulate flow over the surface of the falling structures.
Let us continue.
I agree that the gov... and corporations tell the story they choose to and it is often not the truth. The question we need to ask is why? I think we can discard the idea that their lies were simply an innocent errors.
Getting into the interlocking terminology and teleology, we learn the structure of a building and of a heirarchy's hidden hand.
Bundy was in the government but was not the government.
Lansdale was in the military but was not the military.
Dulles et al were in the CIA but were not the CIA.
I am learning to look at the critical fifteen seconds and seeing what has not been described until now.
We have all been hypnotized into "seeing" the assassination as an isolated event with a simple, crude, and false sponsor.
The government is simply one of a pile of discarded theories, much as the theories of the collapse have not held up under scrutiny.
A conspiracy which escapes detection is a successful one.
One not reliant upon institutional constructs or ephemeral political personae.
I posit the two analyses have much in common.
Three towers fell and two wars of greater than decade length ensued to the ends of unnamed sponsors.
I posit their collapse was foreordained and the means have not been identified.
John O'Neill was attempting to warn, was sidelined, humiliated, and crushed within their rubble.
I find continuing satisfaction in the study of the flow of capital and heroin and particulate flow over the surface of the falling structures.
Let us continue.