18-06-2012, 11:39 PM
A poster at the 911 Free Forums recently wrote:
But if you don't do research and work with data... it's all evangelism.... or if you don't at least accept that data drives the understanding of mechanism not political necessity... than you can at least have a open mind... something missing on both sides of the false dichotomy about what happened on 9/11.
An please Ed... don't tell me how full your 9/11 truth church pews are... parishioners are followers not leaders or free thinkers... And if you cite Lynn Margulis as a 911 Truth leader, please do tell what research she has done to shed light on the matter at hand. I mean no disrespect to Lynn as she's done some very impressive work in biology, but physics and engineering??? I think she's out of her depth there. Don't you?
"....the beauty of producing information from data in the way it's being done here is the nuance and the intellectual integrity behind it, rather than aggressive, agenda driven evangelism. The key is the ability and the permission to be surprised and turned by your own research, regardless of political necessity. I've always found it it refreshing and delightful such a venue was around, and have never been more angered at its vile abusers."
But if you don't do research and work with data... it's all evangelism.... or if you don't at least accept that data drives the understanding of mechanism not political necessity... than you can at least have a open mind... something missing on both sides of the false dichotomy about what happened on 9/11.
An please Ed... don't tell me how full your 9/11 truth church pews are... parishioners are followers not leaders or free thinkers... And if you cite Lynn Margulis as a 911 Truth leader, please do tell what research she has done to shed light on the matter at hand. I mean no disrespect to Lynn as she's done some very impressive work in biology, but physics and engineering??? I think she's out of her depth there. Don't you?