25-06-2012, 03:33 PM
Mark Stapleton Wrote:[
I think you are suggesting that the interests of the Sponsors and the interests of Israel are two separate things. I'm saying they are one and the same.
In any case, if serving the interests of the Sponsors means protecting and covering up for Israel's actions, doesn't that indicate that the Sponsors and Israel share common interests? And that these interests clearly overrode those of the US, which LBJ had sworn to uphold?
The US would never let itself be controlled by a small country like Israel unless it served a purpose. Once you understand Johnson served Israel's purposes as a power that didn't have to unless it wanted to then you understand the Sponsors were in control of both Israel and the US. Likewise the US and its security apparatus would never let a foreign nation assassinate a chief of state unless it wanted to. Or even better, unless those trying to create false Sponsors wanted it to.
What this comes down to is whether Piper's suggestion that Ben Gurion gave the hit order on JFK is true? Even Piper says he doesn't have proof. In my opinion, whether or not Ben Gurion gave the hit order, Final Judgment exposes a critical Mediterranean underground that was directly connected to Clay Shaw's Permindex cabal. I think my point is not to throw out this very legitimate Kennedy Assassination Mediterranean china shop by either knee-jerking anti-semitism, deep political structure, or anti-jewish antipathy too strongly. There's a very important nexus shown in Final Judgment that bridges Israel, the US Military Industrial Complex, the US mob, CIA, and the anti-Castro underground that might very adequately explain the "Jews are behind us now" spoken by Homer Echevarria.

