28-06-2012, 04:10 AM
I don't see the point here. Sure Kennedy was concerned with it as he was also concerned with the nuclear programmes of other states, the UAR is mentioned. Dimona was up and running for years before Kennedy took office. Truman helped them get their first nuclear reactor in Nachal Sorec under the Atoms for Peace programme. They worked with the French later to build Dimona. France did this because of the Suez crisis and it was known then to be the basis for the Israeli nuclear weapons program. The cosy relationship with France ended with De Gaulle who wanted to stop the supply of uranium but all Israel had to do was agree to sham inspections and say it was peaceful and the French contracts ran their term until 1966. Norway and the UK were busy shipping things to Israel in the 50's and 60's. There is no way Kennedy could close it down regardless of what he wanted to do. It wasn't down town Texas. As you remember the big aid money had not been given at that time so he was unable to with draw any funding to put any pressure on. They already had what they wanted nuclear wise and there was nothing JFK could do. No point, if this is it, to assassinate him. That horse had long bolted.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.

