29-06-2012, 04:02 PM
Phil Dragoo Wrote:The thesis, that Israel assassinated JFK, is not proved.
The assertion, that Israel owns, controls, directs U.S. policy is belied by its exclusion from the recent counterterrorism conference as the series of events in the Arab Spring work against its interest.
Secular regimes are replaced by Islamist ones. Witness the remarks of the General Guide of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood Mohammed Badie on June 14:
"How happy would be the Muslims if all Muslim rulers made the Palestinian cause a pivotal issue, around which Muslims, rulers and the ruled, would line up," he stated. According to Badie, they would ally to make "the sole goal for all of them the recovery of al Aqsa Mosque, freeing it from the filth of the Zionists, and imposing Muslim rule throughout beloved Palestine."
This is a government installed with the congratulations of the current U.S. president. Shall we expect per the extant thesis that the congratulator is now persona non grata to Israel's "psychopathic leaders" and its "murderous Mossad"?
Never thought I would disagree with the deep poet bard. In the end if the CIA helped form the "revolutions" that displaced previous arab leaders they would form a bond with those revolutions at an important level that would be remembered. The objective here was to destabilize arab states. The entrenched leaders of those countries aspired more to anti-Israeli politics than Islamic. If CIA helped overthrow those entrenched leaders and their governments they would be undermining the established anti-Israel order in the region. If those governments were replaced by Islamic governments that would only make a more ripe and justifiable target for the already-in-place War On Terror forces. This, in fact, brings out a more polarized 'enemy' that is easier to justify attacks against by this international force. This action is designed to delegitimize the political validity of those arab nations. You couldn't think of a better way to do that than Islamicizing them at a time when you are trying to get the rest of the world to see them as dangerous terrorists. This drastic polarization and inflamation only serves the same Military Industrial Complex powers that sought to create a profitable need for their military involvement just as they did during Kennedy's time. To say this doesn't serve Israel's purposes, and is therefore invalid, is to miss that these countries were already out to get Israel anyway. The end goal being that popular movements can be coopted and eventually shed their Islamic elements in favor of international I-Phone/internet culture which is automatically pro-Israel. Typical of CIA/Mossad, there's an end game here that isn't immediately visible from its direct parts.
Phil Dragoo Wrote:Placing "Zionists" as Sponsors in the assassination of JFK is tantamount to granting them Sponsorship status in the long-view business model rather than the primitive and simplistic ad hoc model revolving around one day in the Autumn of 1963.
Are these Zionists then universal catalysts of evil or simply another in a series of pathetic false sponsors.
The pathetic thing here is that Israel had become a strong CIA cause whose interests were involved in destabilizing the Kennedy administration. This cause has grown into the CIA power that it is today. These forces flanked and overtook American democracy. Based on hate alone? I'm not sure.

