Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Albert Doyle]

Albert

This is my response regarding Lansky in an oldest thread

CH: As for Lansky in particular and OC in general: Do you conclude that he/they are Facilitators, Sponsors, and/or patsys?
V: This is a difficult one. If Ruby was involved in a plot to kill JFK and he was calling Rosselli, Gruber and McWillie then we should conclude that Lansky was also involved. If Ruby was not involved then all of them might have been involved with Oswald in Anti-Castro operations unrelated to JFK.
On the other hand The Lansky syndicate and Trafficante had a business interest in South East Asia and specifically the Golden triangle of heroin. They had cooperated with Helliwell and JM/WAVE in laundering drug money, in Lansky casinos and Florida banks.
So in my mind, Lansky was either another patsy, or he was used by the Far-East CIA elements involved in the assignation to launder drug money that were used to facilitate the assassination. It would have been easier and safer than to use H.L.Hunt's money to finance it.

And since you would like to repeat ourselves , here we go again

Israel is the cover and alibi of the real sponsors, and Piper's book a disinformation project with respect to the sum of its parts

You obviously haven't read Piper. The things you point-out are secondary to the mainline French Connection/Tibor Rosenbaum branch of that nexus. Don't you understand that the Golden Triangle heroin you reference was smuggled back to CIA-protected French Connection heroin labs in Marseille just like in the movie? In return the Corsican heroin mob assisted in anti-communist black ops that happened to be funded by the money from that very nexus. That was the whole purpose of the covert funding. Don't you understand that the Helliwell, Lansky, Florida bank money laundry's main trunk was Tibor Rosenbaum's Banque Du Credit Internacional - which was a main Israeli/Mossad funding source? Sorry, you might protest over repeating yourself, but you're not coming anywhere close to answering what either I or Piper wrote. You haven't even scratched the surface. I believe Piper's point is that many players in the assassination had dual loyalties. Your references to the Golden Triangle are so irrelevant as to indicate an ignorance of the subject.

If you read what you quoted above it says "If Ruby was involved in a plot to kill Kennedy...then we should conclude Lansky was involved".

Well, we know he was, don't we?