12-08-2012, 09:43 PM
Quote:The issue is not Charles Drago, or what someone else thinks of him or calls him. As in that Buddhist tale, I have left Charles Drago and the "Amazon thread on the side of the river and moved on.
Too bad you don't realize that one of the top suspects for that racist rant on Charles has at times posted links from the "Veterans Today" webpage.And,no IT'S NOT YOU!
It's hate speech that is the issue Ed.Hate speech that has the capacity to influence the gullible.So what is the target audience for "Veterans Today"?There are probably 25 million veterans in this country,and I can assure you only a very small percentage of them would agree with Gordon Duff's viewpoint and tactics.
That's why I said that Duff should change the name of the webpage.It doesn't reflect at all the viewpoint of the vast majority of veterans.In fact it's a complete turnoff.If Gordon Duff named the webpage something like "The Duff Veterans Report",I wouldn't be saying this stuff,because that means "he owns what is put up there".But Duff plays with words,as the name "Veterans Today",seems to imply that this is how Veterans are and think.Do you understand that Ed?
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.â€
Buckminster Fuller
Buckminster Fuller