Tunisia

[Bill Kelly]

So much for intelligent discussion about what I think is an important subject, one that I recognized as a Deep Political Event when it began and started a blog on the topic:

Now comes the part where you play the innocent victim. This is how it works. You state your case, but do not engage other explanations. You either ignore or misstate other arguments. And you resort to repeating your thesis over and over again. Finally, once your frustrated hopeful partners in debate become frustrated, you roll your eyes. What is the great Bill Kelly supposed to do when he is has to talk to idiots like these? Finally, you proclaim your expertise, which by the way is on full demo at your website.

Just seems like we just went through the same thing with someone else.

<a href="https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?10546-Martial-Law-Imminent-Arrival>Martial Law: Imminent Arrival"</a>

PS How does one make a hypertext link here. <a href=>

Without stating your case, you told me to Fook off.

I've stated my case, and I accept Maggie's statement that because she is against foreign intervention does not mean she supports dictators, but I also take that to mean she is against Russian, Chinese and Iranian intervention.

What other explanations do you want?
What arguments am I ignoring? If I have restated my thesis, then it has not been refuted. What's your thesis, all I know is that you responded to mine by saying Fook off.

My expertise is only that I have been following these events since they began, have read everything Maggie and others have sent me or referred to or posted, and will continue to do so, but am not convinced that the regional revolution that is now sweeping North Africa and the middle east is anything but what it appears to be - a popular democratic uprising the purpose of which is to overthrow unpopular dictators and install some semalance of democracy.

And I resent being called names by someone who doesn't know me.

BK