29-08-2012, 05:15 AM
Thanks for the support, Dawn and Seamus. Keith- didn't remember Gary calling DPF that. That might indicate that there is a fraternity aspect here, or perhaps we do think alike.
Mark- my contributions to this thread have been about you, and the way you were greeted here. I may in fact agree with Charles and others in respect to the ultimate value of your ideas, but I objected to what I felt was the dismissive rudeness you were met with.
I didn't mean to condemn this forum. DPF is what it is; it serves a purpose and I'm happy to be a member for as long as they'll have me. The people that run it have the right to do so as they see fit, just as the people who run the EF, Lancer or any other forum have that right.
Do most of you want to see the research community united? If so, under what general principles could we be united? Agreeing that there was a conspiracy? That it involved powerful movers and shakers? That there is still an ongoing coverup? What could we rally around, to reach a consensus?
Mark- my contributions to this thread have been about you, and the way you were greeted here. I may in fact agree with Charles and others in respect to the ultimate value of your ideas, but I objected to what I felt was the dismissive rudeness you were met with.
I didn't mean to condemn this forum. DPF is what it is; it serves a purpose and I'm happy to be a member for as long as they'll have me. The people that run it have the right to do so as they see fit, just as the people who run the EF, Lancer or any other forum have that right.
Do most of you want to see the research community united? If so, under what general principles could we be united? Agreeing that there was a conspiracy? That it involved powerful movers and shakers? That there is still an ongoing coverup? What could we rally around, to reach a consensus?

