Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UK Monarchy
#2
'Absolute secrecy' law for royals criticised by Information Commissioner

By Raymond BuchananBBC Scotland political correspondent


Plans by the Scottish government to keep any communication between ministers and the royal family secret are in direct conflict with the public interest, MSPs are to hear.
Scotland's Information Commissioner has described proposed reforms to freedom of information law as setting a "worrying precedent".
Rosemary Agnew is due to give evidence to Holyrood's Finance Committee.
It is looking at changes to the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Bill.
As part of the reforms, ministers want to give an "absolute" exemption to communications between the Scottish government and senior members of the Royal Family.
At the moment, information about the Royal Family can be published in Scotland if it passes a public interest test.
Ministers want to remove that test thereby banning any release and bringing the situation in Scotland into line with legislation in other parts of the UK.
The amendment would exempt communications with the monarch, the heir to the throne or a member of the royal household acting on their behalf.
'Restricting rights'But in her response to the proposed changes, Ms Agnew said: "The amendment will create a provision which requires absolute secrecy in relation to any aspect of communications with senior royals in all circumstances - regardless of how far removed the information is from the content of communications, or of the weight of the public interest in favour of release.

The amendment on correspondence on (or behalf of) Her Majesty provides for consistency of approach across the UK"
SpokesmanScottish government

"It is my considered view that it will... have the effect of unnecessarily restricting rights and create a worrying precedent with the introduction of a wide-ranging absolute exemption which sets aside the public interest.
"The amendment is therefore in direct conflict with the public interest."
Ms Agnew believes current protections for communications between ministers and the royals are sufficient.
A spokesman for the Scottish government said: "The amendment on correspondence on (or behalf of) Her Majesty provides for consistency of approach across the UK and in doing so ensures an appropriate level of protection for Scotland's current and future heads of state by safeguarding the well established conventions of confidentiality.
"Key elements of the Freedom of Information (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill include greater flexibility in reducing the lifespan of exemptions paving the way for more information to be made public earlier.
"The bill also makes the legislation stronger by making more effective the ability to bring a prosecution where requested information has been deliberately altered, destroyed or concealed."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-sc...s-19565565
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
UK Monarchy - by Magda Hassan - 01-09-2012, 11:55 AM
UK Monarchy - by Magda Hassan - 12-09-2012, 11:58 AM
UK Monarchy - by Magda Hassan - 27-09-2012, 02:55 AM
UK Monarchy - by Magda Hassan - 16-01-2013, 12:30 AM
UK Monarchy - by Magda Hassan - 12-03-2014, 01:06 PM
UK Monarchy - by David Guyatt - 12-03-2014, 03:01 PM
UK Monarchy - by David Guyatt - 12-03-2014, 03:02 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Monarchy in the US!? Robert Dolen 20 13,811 05-01-2011, 10:16 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)