The Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic Model Applied to 9/11

[Lauren Johnson]

9-11 can conform to the Deep Politics model without any controlled demolition in my opinion. Flying planes into towers and causing their destruction is a form of controlled demolition. What people miss in this is we would have attacked the Middle East whether the Towers collapsed or not.

From a deep political point of view, the sponsors intended for the towers to come down on 9/11. Had they just stood there smoldering that day, would have sent the aftermath into an entirely different direction. Assuming there was no plane switching that day, body identification and recovery would have been the first task. The buildings would have been crawling with structural engineers analysing the buildings for safety, repair, and whatever demolition needed. Instead we were informed we had been attacked by 19 Arab fanatics who represent people who hate our freedom. The story still goes from there. I argue we would not be living that story if the buildings had been smoldering broken stubs.

Since the buildings had to fall, the sponsors would have had to be assured that just the act of crashing planes into the buildings would have guaranteed that result. No explosives needed? Fine. Let's roll.