02-10-2012, 03:03 AM
Jeffrey
Thank you for the diagrams. In effect the very large structure's load was transferred from eighty columns to forty columns hence the lower half dozen floors were twice as critical member for member.
The triangulation of the typical truss, compression in the vertical slant, tension in the horizontal, puts vastly different forces into play than in the one and two structures. The placement over potentially unstable electrical and fuel components makes it (to this layman) a large, crude bomb.
The tone of Dan Rather in his observation of the collapse might be an early expression of skepticism. He infamously marked Zapruder as showing a shot from behind, then fell for a memo I could duplicate with Word defaults, so his behavior isn't expertly qualified, only a telltale to a later more generalized view of controlled demolition.
You postulate that either structural failures caused by an eight-hour fire or a controlled demolition would have or could have produced the theatrical collapse.
My bias disclosure: the entire day was foreordained, and enabled by a sponsor motivated by other than islamocentric extremism, and the physical interaction stacks under the cryptostrategic.
Nevertheless, as you point out, the official explanation of the collapse of WTC7 is a study of data lacunae, something we come to expect after TWA 800 was sold as a center fuel tank explosion, and all of the historic magic beans/family cow dealings with truth.
What is glaring is that there is not a clear official statement of causality, namely, that an electrical surge ignited fuel storage and the unmanaged forge smelted the critical trusses, not immediately, but over a full workday.
The level which could remove John O'Neill from his FBI responsibility and allow no-flies to fly with the benefit of lessons warned of by Special Agent Colleen Rowley is reminiscent of accumulated evidence of systematic silencing prior to Dallas on the part of the various offices of the Bureau, a collateral of the otherwise flawed Act of Treason by Mark North.
Then of course the Bin Laden family was allowed to fly while fighters were stalled and civilians grounded.
I will go back and look for an explanation of WTC7 in any public report--we will recall CIA provided a helpful cartoon to explain how TWA 800 broke itself into two elements to cause the appearance of a missile streaking upwards by one-to-two hundred witnesses.
And the so-helpful Kalstrom assured us there was no missile even as he ordered the arrest of evidence gatherers with telltale HE trace in their hands.
Our lying eyes or a government cartoon--
Thank you for the diagrams. In effect the very large structure's load was transferred from eighty columns to forty columns hence the lower half dozen floors were twice as critical member for member.
The triangulation of the typical truss, compression in the vertical slant, tension in the horizontal, puts vastly different forces into play than in the one and two structures. The placement over potentially unstable electrical and fuel components makes it (to this layman) a large, crude bomb.
The tone of Dan Rather in his observation of the collapse might be an early expression of skepticism. He infamously marked Zapruder as showing a shot from behind, then fell for a memo I could duplicate with Word defaults, so his behavior isn't expertly qualified, only a telltale to a later more generalized view of controlled demolition.
You postulate that either structural failures caused by an eight-hour fire or a controlled demolition would have or could have produced the theatrical collapse.
My bias disclosure: the entire day was foreordained, and enabled by a sponsor motivated by other than islamocentric extremism, and the physical interaction stacks under the cryptostrategic.
Nevertheless, as you point out, the official explanation of the collapse of WTC7 is a study of data lacunae, something we come to expect after TWA 800 was sold as a center fuel tank explosion, and all of the historic magic beans/family cow dealings with truth.
What is glaring is that there is not a clear official statement of causality, namely, that an electrical surge ignited fuel storage and the unmanaged forge smelted the critical trusses, not immediately, but over a full workday.
The level which could remove John O'Neill from his FBI responsibility and allow no-flies to fly with the benefit of lessons warned of by Special Agent Colleen Rowley is reminiscent of accumulated evidence of systematic silencing prior to Dallas on the part of the various offices of the Bureau, a collateral of the otherwise flawed Act of Treason by Mark North.
Then of course the Bin Laden family was allowed to fly while fighters were stalled and civilians grounded.
I will go back and look for an explanation of WTC7 in any public report--we will recall CIA provided a helpful cartoon to explain how TWA 800 broke itself into two elements to cause the appearance of a missile streaking upwards by one-to-two hundred witnesses.
And the so-helpful Kalstrom assured us there was no missile even as he ordered the arrest of evidence gatherers with telltale HE trace in their hands.
Our lying eyes or a government cartoon--