MP George Galloway on 9/11 - Calls for a new inquiry

[Charles Drago]

And of course you realize that you're referencing the Facilitators of the 9-11 plot -- whose prime motive, as you describe it, may or may not have been the prime motive of the Sponsors.

Could it be accurately said that the definition of "Sponsor" is one whom, even though the facilitators did not act with the prime motive of the Sponsor in mind, was powerful enough to benefit from the result anyway?

No.

By the model's definition, Facilitators cannot act absent "licensing" by Sponsors. Facilitators facilitate Sponsors' true and full agendas. Facilitators -- even at the highest levels -- of world-historic crimes are almost never aware of Sponsors' true and full agendas.

Or even better, the facilitators themselves are betrayed by a 'false flag' by the Sponsors?

"Better"???

I find this sentence to be indecipherable. Unless you're suggesting that, as was the case in the JFK hit, certain Facilitators who were promised certain post-hit outcomes that subsequently were not delivered were dissuaded from seeking retribution by the threat of being exposed after the fact as "Sponsors" of the assassination.