06-10-2012, 05:33 PM
Correct on both Dawn.
1. I do not understand why Rago is allowed to break the rules at Spartacus with impunity. Duncan exposed the fact that he is posting under a false name weeks ago. And so very likely that is a false photo also. Yet he is still allowed to continue doing so. Why have rules then if someone can break them and everyone knows it? Why don't the mods like Jeffries and Scully consult with Duncan on this and if the evidence is sound, which it seems to be, he either comes up with a real name and photo, or he is gone?
2. I take a back seat to no one in wanting the Palestinians to have their own homeland. In fact, I have gotten into arguments with some Jewish friends over this issue. As I continually point out that, prior to the end of the war, there was a map with Palestine on it, but no Israel. Today, there is an Israel with no Palestine. And I despise the Zionist ultras like Martin "Crazy" Peretz who has used his pulpit to completely distort the issue and belittle eloquent and responsible Palestinian spokesmen like the late Edward Said in the pages of the once proud New Republic. (Which under Peretz became a nutty Zionist-Neo Con cesspool.)
But to try and utilize the anger and frustration against Israel on this issue and channel it into the JFK case and hope that you can pick up some advocates that way by mentioning things like the Liberty and that Angleton manned the Israeli desk at CIA, I mean to me this is scraping around a trash bin in an anti Semitic crusade in order to dupe people for one's own purposes. Relying on their ignorance of the USA-Israel alliance in the early sixties. It was nothing like it became after the two Arab-Israeli wars--not even close.
And make no mistake, that is what Rago is doing. Consider:
1. He wants to try and revive the bullshit about CE 399 not being substituted on the way to FBI HQ. He does this by attempting to discredit the testimony of Wright and replace it with Nathan Pool. Even though Pool did not even show up until FOURTEEN YEARS later! And neither Wright nor Tomlinson ever mention the guy. So Rago wants us to reject the work of John Hunt, Aguilar and Thompson which exposes the FBI cover up that very night, all on a guy who somehow injected himself into the case 14 years later. I mean did Pool not notice that there was an FBI and WC inquiry going on in 1964? (You should read Weisberg on Pool.)
2. He wants us to think that instead of the assassin from the front being behind the picket fence at the end, with a storm drain and parking lot right near him for escape and the fence there to hide his personage, and a silenced rifle with scope to get off an accurate shot, well dead wrong for Rago--the assassin was really a policeman on the knoll with a handgun. Boy, that's really clandestine huh? How did we all miss that?
3. He wants everyone to think that somehow people like Garrison, Melanson, and Newman were all barking up the wrong tree by saying the CIA was the prime suspect in the case. And he wants us all to forget all the good evidence they,and others, have produced to demonstrate that. Instead, he wants us to all take on the mantle of a group as anti Semitic as the Holocaust denying Spotlight and now say that, shit, how could we have missed it? Who cares about Sylvia Odio; who cares about 544 Camp Street; who cares about Phillips and the CIA's anti FPCC program; who cares that Oswald was part of the CIA's fake defector program and working under Phillips as an anti FPCC agent provocateur; who cares about the complex charade down in Mexico City in which the CIA brilliantly ensnared Oswald like a rat in a trap seven weeks before the assassination; who cares about Ruth and Michael Paine being accessories after the fact and producing all the false evidence for both the JFK case, the Walker shooting, and Mexico City; who cares about George DeM being asked by the CIA to befriend Oswald on his return from Russia; who cares about the rightwing White Russian community befriending the alleged commie and doing their best to separate Marina from Lee; who cares about Shaw and Ferrie and Oswald in Clinton and Jackson that summer etc etc.
See this is all in Rago's jibberish, "Barking up the wrong tree". It was the Mossad. Even though you cannot connect them to any of the above. He wants us to throw all this powerful evidence out the door and embrace Spotlight and the nutty Final Judgment.
Either the guy is a fruit or he is an agent. But in any case, what is he still going at Spartacus? I mean will they not be happy until everyone leaves and all that is left is Von Pein and Rago?
PS: For the record, I did read Final Judgment. As with many disinfo books on this case, I threw it out.
1. I do not understand why Rago is allowed to break the rules at Spartacus with impunity. Duncan exposed the fact that he is posting under a false name weeks ago. And so very likely that is a false photo also. Yet he is still allowed to continue doing so. Why have rules then if someone can break them and everyone knows it? Why don't the mods like Jeffries and Scully consult with Duncan on this and if the evidence is sound, which it seems to be, he either comes up with a real name and photo, or he is gone?
2. I take a back seat to no one in wanting the Palestinians to have their own homeland. In fact, I have gotten into arguments with some Jewish friends over this issue. As I continually point out that, prior to the end of the war, there was a map with Palestine on it, but no Israel. Today, there is an Israel with no Palestine. And I despise the Zionist ultras like Martin "Crazy" Peretz who has used his pulpit to completely distort the issue and belittle eloquent and responsible Palestinian spokesmen like the late Edward Said in the pages of the once proud New Republic. (Which under Peretz became a nutty Zionist-Neo Con cesspool.)
But to try and utilize the anger and frustration against Israel on this issue and channel it into the JFK case and hope that you can pick up some advocates that way by mentioning things like the Liberty and that Angleton manned the Israeli desk at CIA, I mean to me this is scraping around a trash bin in an anti Semitic crusade in order to dupe people for one's own purposes. Relying on their ignorance of the USA-Israel alliance in the early sixties. It was nothing like it became after the two Arab-Israeli wars--not even close.
And make no mistake, that is what Rago is doing. Consider:
1. He wants to try and revive the bullshit about CE 399 not being substituted on the way to FBI HQ. He does this by attempting to discredit the testimony of Wright and replace it with Nathan Pool. Even though Pool did not even show up until FOURTEEN YEARS later! And neither Wright nor Tomlinson ever mention the guy. So Rago wants us to reject the work of John Hunt, Aguilar and Thompson which exposes the FBI cover up that very night, all on a guy who somehow injected himself into the case 14 years later. I mean did Pool not notice that there was an FBI and WC inquiry going on in 1964? (You should read Weisberg on Pool.)
2. He wants us to think that instead of the assassin from the front being behind the picket fence at the end, with a storm drain and parking lot right near him for escape and the fence there to hide his personage, and a silenced rifle with scope to get off an accurate shot, well dead wrong for Rago--the assassin was really a policeman on the knoll with a handgun. Boy, that's really clandestine huh? How did we all miss that?
3. He wants everyone to think that somehow people like Garrison, Melanson, and Newman were all barking up the wrong tree by saying the CIA was the prime suspect in the case. And he wants us all to forget all the good evidence they,and others, have produced to demonstrate that. Instead, he wants us to all take on the mantle of a group as anti Semitic as the Holocaust denying Spotlight and now say that, shit, how could we have missed it? Who cares about Sylvia Odio; who cares about 544 Camp Street; who cares about Phillips and the CIA's anti FPCC program; who cares that Oswald was part of the CIA's fake defector program and working under Phillips as an anti FPCC agent provocateur; who cares about the complex charade down in Mexico City in which the CIA brilliantly ensnared Oswald like a rat in a trap seven weeks before the assassination; who cares about Ruth and Michael Paine being accessories after the fact and producing all the false evidence for both the JFK case, the Walker shooting, and Mexico City; who cares about George DeM being asked by the CIA to befriend Oswald on his return from Russia; who cares about the rightwing White Russian community befriending the alleged commie and doing their best to separate Marina from Lee; who cares about Shaw and Ferrie and Oswald in Clinton and Jackson that summer etc etc.
See this is all in Rago's jibberish, "Barking up the wrong tree". It was the Mossad. Even though you cannot connect them to any of the above. He wants us to throw all this powerful evidence out the door and embrace Spotlight and the nutty Final Judgment.
Either the guy is a fruit or he is an agent. But in any case, what is he still going at Spartacus? I mean will they not be happy until everyone leaves and all that is left is Von Pein and Rago?
PS: For the record, I did read Final Judgment. As with many disinfo books on this case, I threw it out.