08-10-2012, 07:03 PM
Thank you for your response. I do feel I need to clarify a couple of points. For one thing I no longer support the Greer theory. I never argued for the Greer theory. I simply believed those theorists who put forth that theory. Now after reading the testimony of the Parkland doctors I realize the Greer theory is not plausible.
The second point I want to clarify is that I still support the lead car theory although probably not a bullet from the lead car. The first research I rely on is Doug Weldon's research on the hole in the front windshield of the presidential limo. Although I disagree with him on where that shot came from. Next research I rely on is Gill Jesus' video, "Was JFK trying to cough up a bullet". That video shows that something startlied Connally and that Kennedy tried to loosen his collar and tie. Because of Gil's video I no longer believe JFK's arm motion was a neurological response to being hit in the spine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpFHYwot6bk
I disagree with Gil Jesus in the thought that what hit JFK was a bullet. The reason I disagree with Gil, is that if JFK was choking on something he would have displayed the universal choke signal with both hands clutching his throat. Instead JFK went limp. While Connally was writhing in pain JFK went limp. He was limp before he was hit with the head shot. I read a theory that umbrella man hit JFK with a paralytic from his umblella. I do not agree with this but I do agree with the paralytic theory. The paralytic would cause JFK to go limp and be stationary for the head shot.
Other research I've done on the lead car makes me support it even more. I was challenged by a member of this forum, "What happened to the back window?". In 1963 there was a car called Mercury Breezeway it's rear window rolled down by means of a switch at the driver's command. The lead car was not a Mercury Breezeway. I believe it was a Ford Galaxy but the mechanism to roll down the window could have been installed in the lead car. http://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk/mercury.htm
Another point is Sherriff Decker's 5323 exhibit. http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc..._0238b.htm. He did not testify before the WC regarding his time in the lead car but he did give the testimony contained in this exhibit. In this testimony he stated that he looked over his shoulder and saw spray from JFK's head. If Decker was facing forward to look back he would have had to look over his right shoulder. Decker had a glass eye. In Decker's pictures he looks at the camera with his left eye, which means the right eye is the glass eye. To see Kennedy's head explode Decker would have had to turn all the way around and not just glance over his shoulder. To see the spray from Kennedy's head it would be much more plausible for Decker to have already been facing backward.
Another curious point is Forrest Sorrels. The more I read the more I see his name mentioned. According to record he sat in the right rear seat of the lead car. He testified he went around with Zapruder to try to get the film developed, Marie Oswald talks about her interactions with Forrest, Abraham Boulden states Sorrels sent him on a wild goose chase to chase done a man that was never mentioned agaoin. Orville Nix tells Mark Lane in an interview that he is a good friend of Forrest Sorrels. I just find Sorrels an engima.
Regarding Charles' edict to the members of this forum not to engage me in debate. I feel sorry for adults who obey such an edict. I don't like coming on this forum because I've been emotionally hurt in the past, but my curiosity of what people thought of Morningstar's theory overcame my personal feelings. I can already think of subject that will probably bring me to write again so I'll probably again get crap. But as a good friend of mine once said, "Life's a bitch".
The second point I want to clarify is that I still support the lead car theory although probably not a bullet from the lead car. The first research I rely on is Doug Weldon's research on the hole in the front windshield of the presidential limo. Although I disagree with him on where that shot came from. Next research I rely on is Gill Jesus' video, "Was JFK trying to cough up a bullet". That video shows that something startlied Connally and that Kennedy tried to loosen his collar and tie. Because of Gil's video I no longer believe JFK's arm motion was a neurological response to being hit in the spine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpFHYwot6bk
I disagree with Gil Jesus in the thought that what hit JFK was a bullet. The reason I disagree with Gil, is that if JFK was choking on something he would have displayed the universal choke signal with both hands clutching his throat. Instead JFK went limp. While Connally was writhing in pain JFK went limp. He was limp before he was hit with the head shot. I read a theory that umbrella man hit JFK with a paralytic from his umblella. I do not agree with this but I do agree with the paralytic theory. The paralytic would cause JFK to go limp and be stationary for the head shot.
Other research I've done on the lead car makes me support it even more. I was challenged by a member of this forum, "What happened to the back window?". In 1963 there was a car called Mercury Breezeway it's rear window rolled down by means of a switch at the driver's command. The lead car was not a Mercury Breezeway. I believe it was a Ford Galaxy but the mechanism to roll down the window could have been installed in the lead car. http://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk/mercury.htm
Another point is Sherriff Decker's 5323 exhibit. http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc..._0238b.htm. He did not testify before the WC regarding his time in the lead car but he did give the testimony contained in this exhibit. In this testimony he stated that he looked over his shoulder and saw spray from JFK's head. If Decker was facing forward to look back he would have had to look over his right shoulder. Decker had a glass eye. In Decker's pictures he looks at the camera with his left eye, which means the right eye is the glass eye. To see Kennedy's head explode Decker would have had to turn all the way around and not just glance over his shoulder. To see the spray from Kennedy's head it would be much more plausible for Decker to have already been facing backward.
Another curious point is Forrest Sorrels. The more I read the more I see his name mentioned. According to record he sat in the right rear seat of the lead car. He testified he went around with Zapruder to try to get the film developed, Marie Oswald talks about her interactions with Forrest, Abraham Boulden states Sorrels sent him on a wild goose chase to chase done a man that was never mentioned agaoin. Orville Nix tells Mark Lane in an interview that he is a good friend of Forrest Sorrels. I just find Sorrels an engima.
Regarding Charles' edict to the members of this forum not to engage me in debate. I feel sorry for adults who obey such an edict. I don't like coming on this forum because I've been emotionally hurt in the past, but my curiosity of what people thought of Morningstar's theory overcame my personal feelings. I can already think of subject that will probably bring me to write again so I'll probably again get crap. But as a good friend of mine once said, "Life's a bitch".